# Nonlinear function continuous but not bounded

I would like an example of a map $f:H\rightarrow R$, where $H$ is a (infinite dimensional) Hilbert space, and $R$ is the real numbers, such that $f$ is continuous, but $f$ is not bounded on the close unit ball $\{ x\in H : \|x\| \leq 1\}$.

Actually, $H$ could be replaced by any Banach space (but not just a normed space-- that's too easy). My motivation is that if $f$ is linear, this is impossible; but I have next to no intuition about non-linear functions.

Edit: Here's an example for $c_0$ which is even differentiable (disclaimer: I found it here: http://www.ms.uky.edu/~larry/paper.dir/korea.ps). Define $f:c_0\rightarrow F$ (where F is your field, real or complex) by $$f(x) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty x_n^n \qquad (x=(x_n)).$$ You can estimate the sum by a geometric progression, so it does converge. A bit of checking shows that f is Frechet differentible (so certainly continuous). But $f(1,1,\cdots,1,0,\cdots)=n$ (if there are $n$ ones) so $f$ is not bounded on the closed unit ball. What I don't immediately see is how to adapt this to $\ell^2$, say.

-

An easy way of doing it in any infinite-dimensional Banach space is to observe that there is a countable discrete subset $\{x_{n}\}_{n = 1}^{\infty}$ of the unit ball by Riesz's lemma (in the Hilbert case you can simply take any orthonormal system). This means that you can find a sequence or radii $r_{n}$ such that the closed balls $\bar{B}_{2r_{n}}(x_{n})$ are pairwise disjoint (take e.g. $r_{n} = \frac{1}{4}$ in the Hilbert setting - I'm being generous here). Putting $f_{n}(x) = \max{\{0,r_{n} - \|x- x_n\|\}}$ you get a continuous function $f_n$ supported on $\bar{B}_{r_n}(x_n)$. The function $f(x) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{n}{r_n} f_n(x)$ is unbounded on the unit ball because $f(x_{n}) = n$ and it is clearly continuous since the balls $\bar{B}_{2r_n}(x_n)$ are pairwise disjoint.

I don't know of a "natural" example off the top of my head.

-
Ah, nice! Actually, in the meantime, I found a differentiable example. I'll add it to my question. – Matthew Daws Mar 28 '11 at 13:54

Can't one reason in the following manner?

Let $H=\ell^2$ and let $\{ e^n:=(\delta_m^n)\}_{n\in \mathbb{Z}}$ be its standard base ($\delta_m^n$ is Kronecker).

Then consider the open balls $B_n:=B(e^n;\frac{1}{2})$: these balls are pairwise disjoint (because the sum of their radii is less than the distance between their centers, which equals $\sqrt{2}$).

In each ball set $f(x):=(n^2+1)(1-2|x-e^n|)$, so that $f(x)$ is radially-decreasing, continuous and bounded in $B_n$ (for the image of $B_n$ is the interval $]0,n^2+1]$) and $f(x)$ approaches zero when $x$ approaches the boundary $\partial B_n$.

Now we have a function $f(x)$ defined on $\bigcup_n B_n$ and we want to extend it to the whole space: the easier way to do this is by setting $f(x)=0$ when $x\notin \bigcup_n B_n$.

The extended function $f(x)$ is defined, continuous and unbounded in $\ell^2$ (for it is unbounded on $B(o;1)$, because $\displaystyle \lim_{n\to \infty}|f(e^n)|= +\infty$), and it is obviously nonlinear: in fact if $R>0$ is sufficiently large, then $f(Re^0+Re^1)=0\neq 3R=Rf(e^0)+Rf(e^1)$ .

It makes sense for me. What do you think?

-
Sorry Theo; I totally forgot a factor $n^2$ in the definition of $f(x)$ in $B_n$. – Pacciu Mar 28 '11 at 13:54
No problem. Now the example is perfectly fine. I removed my comment as it is no longer relevant. – t.b. Mar 28 '11 at 13:56

Here is another construct. Let $H$ be any Hilbert space and $\{e_n\}_{n=1}^\infty$ be an orthonormal basis. Then $\|e_n - e_m\|^2 = 2$ if $m\not = n$, so $\|e_m - e_n\| = \sqrt{2}$ if $m \not= n$.

Denote by $U_n$ the closed unit ball about $e_n$. Each $U_n$ is closed and is a positive uniform distance ($\sqrt{2} - 1$) from any other $U_n$; the union of these balls is closed. Put $U = \bigcup_n U_n$. Now define the function $f: U \rightarrow R$ by $f(n) = n$ if $x \in U_n$.

Since $U$ is a closed subset of the ball of radius 2 about the origin in $H$, by the Tietze extension theorem, there is a continuous extension of $f$ defined on the closed ball of radius 2 about the origin. This function is continuous and unbounded.

-
How is that different? You're replacing an easy explicit construction by appealing to a somewhat subtle theorem, but the idea is exactly the same. – t.b. Apr 22 '11 at 3:47