Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

After i read Gowers's paper on The "Two Cultures of Mathematics" my impression is that a combinatorialist is considered a problem solver.

I am more interested in pure aspects of mathematical analysis, what an analyst is considered in this categorization? a problem solver? a theory builder? or somewhere in between?

share|improve this question

put on hold as primarily opinion-based by amWhy, Davide Giraudo, Rick Decker, Mike Miller, Avitus 12 hours ago

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I think analysis has more than enough room for both approaches (and everything in between). –  Gerry Myerson Feb 4 '13 at 9:02
This is kind of silly question! Wouldn't you consider analysts in differential equations or mathematical physicists to be problem solvers? And wouldn't you consider Richard Stanley to be theory builder? It's not that cut and dried. –  Mathemagician1234 Feb 4 '13 at 9:04
As already pointed out, this is not a function of the field, but rather of the person doing it. –  mrf Feb 4 '13 at 9:05
@Mathemagician1234 what a ridiculous way to make a point :) –  Akram Hassan Feb 4 '13 at 9:29

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.