Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

By an plane affine curve I mean a zero locus of a non-zero polynomial $f\in k[X,Y]$ in $k^2$.

So far I have worked out that on irreducible plane affine curves, the Zariski topology is the co-finite topology. So I only need a bijection between any two such curves.

But I do not know how to write down such a bijection.

share|cite|improve this question

It is clearly enough to establish that such curves have the same cardinality, which must be equal to $|k|$, because the affine line has precisely this many points. There are many ways to prove this result, some more involved than others.

Assume I have a curve $C$ given by an irreducible polynomial $f$. Because $C \subseteq k^{2}$, the cardinality of the curve is bounded above by

$|k^{2}| = |k| ^{2} = |k|$,

where the latter equality holds because our field must be infinite. It is thus enough to establish that $|k| \leq |C|$.

Write down your polynomial $f$ as follows

$f(x, y) = x^{d}f_{d}(y) + x^{d-1}f_{d-1}(y) + \ldots + x^{0}f_{0}(y)$,

where we may assume that $d > 0$. Indeed, if it is not, then replace $x$ by $y$. It cannot happen that $d = 0$ in both cases since then $f$ would be constant and in particular would not define a curve. Let $A = y_{1}, \ldots, y_{n}$ be the zeroes of $f_{d}(y)$. The map $C \cap \{ (x, y) \ | \ y \notin A \} \rightarrow (k \setminus A)$ given by projecting onto $y$-coordinate is surjective, because on each line $y = c, c \notin A$, the curve $C$ is given by a positive degree polynomial in $x$ and our field is algebraically closed, so such a polynomial must have a root.

This shows that $|k \setminus A| \leq |C \cap \{ (x, y) \ | \ y \notin A \}| \leq |C|$, but $|k \setminus A| = |k|$, because they only differ by a finite number of elements. This ends the argument,

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you. But why is there a bijection between $k$ and $k^2$? – Montez Feb 3 '13 at 12:48
Because $k$ is an infinite field, and for all infinite cardinals $\kappa$, $\kappa = \kappa^2$. (This requires the axiom of choice.) – Zhen Lin Feb 3 '13 at 13:08
No, $\kappa=\kappa^2$ holds without choice. But that every set is isomorphic to a cardinal, that requires choice. @Montez: You can look this up in introductory texts on set theory. – Martin Brandenburg Feb 3 '13 at 13:53

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.