Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $f : \mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}, f \in C^2$. I have to prove that for every nondegenerate critical point of $f$, there exists a neighbourhood which does not contain any further critical points.

I know that I will have to look at the Taylor formula and I'm pretty sure that I have to use that $\det (\partial_{ij} f(x)) \neq 0$ for all $x$ which are nondegenerate, that is to say the Jacobi-matrix is invertible. This makes me feel like I should use the Inverse function theorem, but to what end?

I'd be really delighted if I could get some advice. Thanks in advance.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

You're on the right track. Apply the inverse function theorem to $({\partial f \over \partial x_1}(x),...,{\partial f \over \partial x_n}(x))$ on a neighborhood of the critical point.

share|cite|improve this answer
Let $x_0$ be the critical nondegenerate point. As far as I know, the inverse function theorem tells me that there exist neighbourhoods $U$ of $x_0$ and $V$ of $0$, such that the inverse function of $Df$ is continuously differentiable. But how do I proceed now? – Huy Mar 27 '11 at 18:02
It will say that $({\partial f \over \partial x_1}(x),...,{\partial f \over \partial x_n}(x))$ is one-to-one on a neighborhood of the critical point (since it has an inverse). So each value can be taken at most once. This includes the value $(0,...,0)$. So there can be just the one critical point. – Zarrax Mar 27 '11 at 18:15
Wow, this is incredibly easy... So I actually don't even need Taylor's formula? – Huy Mar 27 '11 at 18:28
no need for Taylor :) – Zarrax Mar 27 '11 at 18:29
Incidentally, another way to see this is to use the fact that around a nondegenerate critical point, a smooth function $f $ looks like $\sum x_i^2 - \sum x_j^2$ (in suitable coordinates). – Akhil Mathew Mar 27 '11 at 20:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.