Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS/Repository/1.0/Disseminate?view=body&id=pdf_1&handle=euclid.bams/1183555477, Ribet gives a proof of Serre's open image theorem for elliptic curves using results from Faltings' proof of the Mordell conjecture. His argument is also repeated at http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108169/modern-proof-of-serres-open-image-theorem.

Unfortunately, I don't understand how he uses Faltings' Theorem to arrive at the punchline.

  1. What does it mean for $\rho_{\ell, E}$ to be semisimple? I thought a semisimple representation was a direct sum of irreducibles, but Shafarevich's Theorem already guarantees that $V_{\ell}$ is irreducible.

  2. What is the significant of the fact that $\text{End}_{\mathfrak{g}_{\ell}}(V_{\ell}) \simeq \mathbb{Q}_{\ell}$ (in the case of a non-CM elliptic curve)?

To summarize, how do these two results rule out the case of a non-split Cartan?

share|cite|improve this question

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.