Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was interested to know whether set of singular points of a smooth map forms a manifold? for example if $f:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^2$ is a smooth map.

and I am trying to find the singular points and singular values of the map $\mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^2$, $z\mapsto z^3-3\bar{z}$, could any one help me? thank you.

share|cite|improve this question
Sard's theorem asserts that the set of singular values has Lebesgue measure zero. – Yuchen Liu Feb 2 '13 at 12:23
jerry : any smooth submanifold of positive codimension will have Lebesgues measure 0 – Glougloubarbaki Feb 2 '13 at 14:19
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The following example is "typical" for maps ${\bf f}:\ \Bbb R^2\to\Bbb R^2$:

Consider the map $${\bf f}:\quad (x,y)\mapsto\left\{\eqalign{u(x,y)&:={1\over2}(x^3-3xy) \cr v(x,y)&:=y\cr}\right.\quad.$$ One computes the Jacobian $$J_{\bf f}(x,y):=\det d{\bf f}(x,y)={3\over2}(x^2-y)\ ,$$ whence ${\bf f}$ is singular along the parabola $y=x^2$. The image $\gamma$ of this parabola can be parametrized by $x$ in the form $$\gamma: \quad x\mapsto {\bf f}(x,x^2)=(-x^3,x^2)\qquad(-\infty<x<\infty)\ .$$ Therefore $\gamma$ is a Neil parabola and has a cusp at the origin.

I suggest you draw pictures showing what's going on in the $(x,y)$-plane and in the $(u,v)$-plane. If you can read German look here, example 2 on p. 106:

share|cite|improve this answer

In your example your map is much more than smooth, it is polynomial. I'm pretty sure algebraic geometry can tell you a lot in this context. However it won't be a smooth manifold in the sense of differential geometry (the zeroes of a function define a submanifold when the function is a submersion near its zeroes, and there are counterexamples when it's not).

If you are just looking at smooth functions, however, almost nothing can be said. Indeed let $F$ be a closed arbitrary subset of $\mathbb{R}$. It is a classical fact that there is a function $f : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ smooth such that the set of its zeroes is exactly $F$. Now if you take a primitive $g$ of $f$, you have a smooth function whose singular points are exactly $F$.

share|cite|improve this answer
to whoever downvoted : please discuss, this is the point of this site after all... – Glougloubarbaki Feb 2 '13 at 14:12

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.