Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider the free algebra $R=\mathbb{Z}\left<x,y\right>$ generated by noncommuting indeterminates $x,y$. Let $I$ denote the two-sided ideal generated by $xy-1$. Then the image of $x$ in $R/I$ has a right inverse but no left inverse.

This is an example mentioned in Lam's "A First Course in Noncommutative Rings" and is also mentioned in this thread: http://math.stackexchange.com/a/70779/22735 .

Here's a silly question that I can't seem to answer: How does one show this? If the image of $x$ had a left inverse, then it must be the image of $y$. Hence $yx-1$ must be contained in $I$. Thus we have $yx-1 = \sum a_i (xy-1) b_i$ for some $a_i,b_i \in R$. In examples similar to this (e.g., in showing the image of $x$ in $R/(xy)$ is a left zero-divisor but not a right zero-divisor), one easily derives a contradiction using the fact that every element of $R$ is represented uniquely as a polynomial in the noncommuting indeterminates. However, in the sum $\sum a_i (xy-1)b_i$, I may have some cancellations, which complicate things.

Lam says that this is "not hard to show (e.g. by specialization)," but I'm not sure what he means by "specialization." I have to be missing something simple...

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

To prove this claim "by specialization" means to find a ring $S$ with 2 elements $a,b$ such that $ab = 1$ but $a$ has no left inverse. Since $R = \mathbb{Z}\langle x,y \rangle$ is the free noncommutative ring with 2 generators, there exists a unique map $R \to S$ sending $x$ to $a$ and $y$ to $b$. Since $ab=1$, this map induces a map on the quotient $R/I \to S$. Now if $x$ had a left inverse in $R/I$, then $a$ would have a left inverse in $S$, contradiction.

One example of such a ring $S$ is the ring of linear transformations of the vector space of infinite sequences of real numbers $(r_1, r_2, r_3, \ldots)$. The shift map sending $(r_1, r_2, r_3, \ldots) \mapsto (r_2, r_3, \ldots)$ has an inverse on only one side.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.