Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am going through an example in my lecture notes. This is it:

Let's introduce the matrix $D_n(\alpha, \beta, \gamma)$, which looks like this:

$$\pmatrix{\beta & \gamma & 0 & 0 & ... & 0 \\ \alpha & \beta & \gamma& 0 & ... & 0 \\ 0 & \alpha & \beta & \gamma & ... & 0 \\ : & : & : &: & ... & : \\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & ... & \beta}$$

To calculate the determinant, $d_n$, lets first decompose by row 1. Here, the first element is $\beta$. Removing this gives us the same matrix again but slightly smaller. We can therefore start with $d_n = \beta d_{n-1}$.

Now look at $\gamma$. As it is in row $1$ and column $2$, it has sign $(-1)$. Matrix now has new first element, $\alpha$ and so for the algebraic complement of $\gamma$, we decompose by column $1$. This gives us $d_n = \beta d_{n-1} - \gamma \alpha _{r - n}$. Let's call this $(*)$.

By now removing columns $\beta$ and $\gamma$ and rows $\beta$ and $\alpha$, we get the originial matrix again, but smaller. We then write $(*)$ as $d_n = \beta d_{n -1} - \gamma \alpha d_{n-2}$

I have a few questions with this. Firstly, when we start looking at column $\gamma$, how does decomposing with column $1$ give us that determinant bit? I am thinking I have written something down wrong but I am not sure what. Also, removing row $\alpha$ won't give us the same matrix again will it as we will now have $a_{11} = \alpha$ when it should be $\beta$, wouldn't we?

EDIT: Sorry, we do get the matrix again as removing column $\gamma$ takes out that $\alpha$. I still don't get the first bit on how they calculated the determinant using column $\gamma$.

share|cite|improve this question
What exactly do you mean with "removing this" when talking of the element $\,\beta\,$? –  DonAntonio Feb 1 '13 at 23:11
@DonAntonio You mean when I'm talking about "removing the column $\beta$? I think that's like literally cancelling out that particular column or row starting with $\beta$ and ignoring it so we can focus on the minor matrix, I think. –  Kaish Feb 1 '13 at 23:16
That's what I thought, @Kaish, yet you still have a non-zero entry in that must take it into account! –  DonAntonio Feb 1 '13 at 23:18
@DonAntonio What do you mean? If we cancel out that row or column, then don't we ignore all the entries in that row or column? Also, how can we have $\alpha_{r - n}$, I think $r$ is the row here? –  Kaish Feb 1 '13 at 23:21
I meant "row" where I wrote column, @Kaish. Sorry. –  DonAntonio Feb 1 '13 at 23:24

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The first term of your first cofactor expansion (with respect to $\beta$) gives you a term of the form $\beta d_{n-1}$ where $d_{n-1}$ is the determinant of the matrix with the first row and column removed, i.e. the $n-1$ by $n-1$ tridiagonal matrix. I assume that this part is clear.

If we move onto the second term in the expansion, then we have the term $(-1)^{1+2}\gamma d'_{n-1}$ where I use $d'_{n-1}$ to denote the determinant of the matrix with the first row and second column removed. i.e. $$d'_{n-1} = \begin{vmatrix}\alpha & \gamma & 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\ 0 & \beta & \gamma & 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0\\0 & \alpha & \beta & \gamma & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \alpha & \beta &\gamma & \cdots & 0 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \ddots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0& \cdots & 0 \end{vmatrix}$$

Now to find this determinant, we cofactor expand this smaller matrix along the first column. All entries are zero except for $\alpha$ so we have quite a bit of reduction. This gives $$d'_{n-1} = \alpha d_{n-2}$$ where $d_{n-2}$ is the $n-2$ by $n-2$ tri-diagonal determinant obtained by removing the first row and column of $d'_{n-1}$. In summary, we have $$d_n = \beta d_{n-1} + (-1)\gamma d'_{n-1} = \beta d_{n-1} - \gamma\alpha d_{n-2}$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Example: $$ \underbrace{\left|\begin{matrix} \beta&\gamma&0&0\\ \alpha&\beta&\gamma&0\\ 0&\alpha&\beta&\gamma\\ 0&0&\alpha&\beta \end{matrix}\right|}_{d_4} \,=\,\beta\underbrace{\left|\begin{matrix} \beta&\gamma&0\\ \alpha&\beta&\gamma\\ 0&\alpha&\beta \end{matrix}\right|}_{d_3} -\gamma\left|\begin{matrix} \alpha&\gamma&0\\ 0&\beta&\gamma\\ 0&\alpha&\beta \end{matrix}\right| \,=\,\beta d_3 -\gamma\underbrace{\alpha\left|\begin{matrix} \beta&\gamma\\ \alpha&\beta \end{matrix}\right|}_{d_2}. $$ The first equality is obtained by Laplace expansion along the first row, while the second one is obtained by Laplace expansion along the first column.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.