Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose $$m\le n < m+1$$

$n$ rational and $m$ a positive integer. How do we prove $m$ is unique?

I realize this is true if $m$ is an integer, so $m$ must be a unique number that is an integer that is less than $n$ and the next integer that is greater than $n$. but how would you prove this fact?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

$\textbf{Hint:}$ Suppose $k$ is an integer such that $k\neq m$ and $k\leq n <k+1$. Since $k\neq m$, we have $k<m$ or $m<k$. In either case find a contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer
Ok, i got it. seems simple enough. BTW, are there any good books to read up on abstract math? Coming from the logistical side of math, I don't get this proof stuff. I just like to crunch numbers. – shosh Feb 1 '13 at 22:59
@shosh As an initiation to mathematical proofs, I like this one a lot: Is it something like this you're looking for? – Git Gud Feb 1 '13 at 23:07
I'd have to see, thanks. I hope this book includes not only the right way to write proofs, but some of the technical details to come up with the solution in solving proofs. – shosh Feb 1 '13 at 23:17

Let $S = \{ m \in \mathbb{Z} \mid m \leq n < m+1 \}$. By the Well-Ordering Principle, $S$ has a smallest element; call it $m_0$. Now suppose that $m_1$ is an integer satisfying $m_1 \leq n < m_1 + 1$. Then $m_1 \in S$, so $m_0 \leq m_1$. Also, $$m_1 - m_0 \leq n - m_0 \leq n - n = 0,$$ so $m_1 \leq m_0$. Since $m_0 \leq m_1$ and $m_1 \leq m_0$, we must have $m_0 = m_1$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.