Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Here is what I've done so far:

[First, want to show $b = 5$ is an upper-bound of $S$.]

So, let: $$S = \{x \in \Bbb R : x \gt 0, x^3 \le 5\}, S \neq \emptyset$$ Assume that $b = 5$ is not an upper-bound of $S$. Then, $\exists x \in S$ s.t. $x^3 \gt 5$. But this contradicts the definition of $S$. Therefore, $b = 5$ is an upper-bound of $S$.

[Next, want to show if $c \lt b$, then $c$ is not an upper-bound.]

This is where I'm stuck... Are you supposed to pick an epsilon here? I tried this also:

Let $\epsilon \gt 0$, $\epsilon = {b - c\over 2}$. I'm not sure how to proceed from here on.

share|cite|improve this question
Of course, there are numbers $c<b$ that are upper bounds, for example $c=2$. – Hagen von Eitzen Feb 1 '13 at 17:34
up vote 1 down vote accepted

What you need to do next is to establish the existence of a least upper bound. Because of the least-upper-bound property of the real numbers, this number must exist because you've shown that $5$ is an upper bound. Let this LUB of $S$ be $L$, which must be a positive real number by definition.

If $L^3 = 5$, we are done. Now, suppose $L^3 < 5$. Try and arrive at a contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer

The set is non-empty because $1\in S$, so we have a non-empty subset of $\mathbb R$ that has an upper bound then $S$ has a supremum, say $\alpha$, Claim: $\alpha^{3}=5$, try to prove the claim.

share|cite|improve this answer

Hint: Is the set empty? how do you know? If you have a non empty set of real numbers with an upper bound, what else do you know?

5 is an upper bound, but there are certainly others. What do you think is the biggest element of that set?

share|cite|improve this answer
The set is assumed to be nonempty. – Tejen Shrestha Feb 1 '13 at 17:36
Are you sure you don't have to prove the set is non-empty? Should be pretty straightforward: find any specific point in the set. – Todd Wilcox Feb 1 '13 at 18:51

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.