Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Here all rings are assumed to lie in the category $\cal C$ of commutative rings with identity, and ${\cal C} (\ R\ ,\ S\ )$ is the set of all ring homomorphisms $F$ from $R$ to $S$ for which $F(1_R)=F(1_S)$. Then $F\in{\mathcal C}(\ R\ ,\ S)$ induces an $R$-module sructure on $S$. Since the functor $\otimes_R$ is right exact, it is not difficult to see that $$S\otimes_RS \cong S\cong S\otimes_SS {\mathrm{\ as \ }} R{\mathrm{-algebras}} \iff \left(S\left/{\mathrm{image}}(F)\right.\right)\otimes_RS=0.\tag{ *} $$

Intuitively, these equivalent conditions seem to show that, for $s_1,\ s_2\ \in S$, the product $s_1 \cdot s_2\in S$ is determined completely by $F(R)$, and just as for localizations, this should show that the equivalent conditions in $(*)$ should also be equivalent to other special statements.

My question if the following: please give, by a reference or a proof or a counterexample to each of the two directions of the following conjecture: $$ S\otimes_RS\cong S \iff F \mathrm{\ is\ a\ flat\ epimorphism\ in\ the \ category \ \mathcal{C}.} $$

share|cite|improve this question
Please elaborate on (*). – user26857 Feb 1 '13 at 8:19
@YACP: See any book on Homological Algebra for the fact that $R\otimes_RS\cong S$ and for right exactness which gives $S\rightarrow S\otimes_RS$ onto $\iff$ $S\otimes_RS$ is the zero map $\iff$ $(S/F(R))$ is the image of a zero map. – Barbara Osofsky Feb 1 '13 at 21:01
I still don't get it: $S\to S\otimes_RS$ onto is the same thing with $S\otimes_RS\cong S$? If yes, why? – user26857 Feb 1 '13 at 21:47
For epimorphisms of commutative rings, see… and the references there. – Martin Brandenburg Feb 2 '13 at 18:41
@Barbara: Your statements and proofs are not correct. Be more careful, then you will see it. – Martin Brandenburg Feb 2 '13 at 18:44
up vote 4 down vote accepted

It is a general theorem that in any category, a map $f : A \to B$ is an epimorphism if and only if the diagram

$$ \begin{matrix} A &\to& B \\ \downarrow & & \downarrow \\ B &\to& B\end{matrix} $$

is a pushout square, where the top and left arrows are $f$ and the right and bottom arrows are the identity.

In the category of commutative rings, pushouts are tensor products. That is, the following is a pushout square

$$ \begin{matrix} R &\to& S \\ \downarrow & & \downarrow \\ T &\to& S \otimes_R T\end{matrix} $$

(where the top and left arrows are the maps used to induce an $R$-module structure on $S$ and $T$)

Therefore, $R \to S$ is epimorphic if and only if the multiplication map $S \otimes_R S \to S$ is an isomorphism.

I suspect simply having $S \cong S \otimes_R S$ is not enough.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks very much. I edited $(*)$ as to read as $R$-algebras. I really appreciate the proof. – Barbara Osofsky Feb 2 '13 at 21:30

The conjecture is true. The reference is as follows:

Daniel Lazard: "Epimorphisme plats", Seminaire Samuel, Algebre Commutative, tome 2 (1967-1968), exp. no4, pp. 1-12. "Lemme 1.0" will give you what you need.

share|cite|improve this answer
You're right about the link, but the link you provided was to Roby's paper, and I meant Lazard's paper from the same volume. The reason I didn't provide a proof is that it seemed what the OP really wanted was a reference, so as to know whether the result was new or not. Moreover, Lazard's 'Lemme 1.0' provides several different characterizations of when a ring map is an epimorphism. That's why I didn't provide a proof. (By the way, I can't seem to get the link to show up correctly. For anyone who wants it, replace both of the "A3"s in the link from YACP's comment with "A4"s.) – neilme Feb 2 '13 at 18:18
Well, I've mixed up the links, but all is in order now. – user26857 Feb 2 '13 at 19:19
Thanks for the reference. I had a copy of that paper, but I had not used it in over 40 years when I retired, and had to recycle a lot of little used reprints and preprints when I retired. Glad to get access to another copy. And you were correct that what I really wanted was confirmation that it was true, although having a proof is nice. – Barbara Osofsky Feb 2 '13 at 21:39
You're welcome! – neilme Feb 3 '13 at 0:48

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.