Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A smooth manifold in $\mathbb{R}^2$ is locally the graph of a $C^1$ function. Consider the graph of $f(x)=x^{1/3}$. Since $f$ is not differentiable at zero, we are in trouble. However, this subset is the graph of $x=y^3$, which IS differentiable at zero.

So is this a manifold? I think so, but I remain confused on the general situation. Is the point that "being a manifold" is a topological property, so it doesn't matter which variable, x or y, is used to locally parametrize the graph?

Any generally illuminating comments will be appreciated!

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

“Being a manifold” is indeed a topological property. However, “being a smooth manifold” is not. Anyhow, in this case it does matter which variable you use.

There are several equivalent definitions of smooth submanifolds of a Euclidean space. One of them requires that the set can be parametrized by some set of coordinates locally: In your example, using the $y$ coordinate works for this purpose. That the $x$ coordinate doesn't is then immaterial.

Another definition requires the submanifold to be locally the zero set of a smooth (possibly vector valued) function, where $0$ is not a critical value of this function. In your example, $x-y^3$ satisfies this requirement.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.