Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $A$ and $B$ be a toeplitz and symmetric positive definite $NxN$ matrices. If $\kappa (A) > \kappa (B)$, how to show that: $\kappa (B^{-1}A) < \kappa (A)$ ? $\kappa $() is condition number of matrix.

Thank you!

share|cite|improve this question

It's not true. Consider e.g. $$ A = \pmatrix{a & 0\cr 0 & 1/a}, \ B = \pmatrix{1/b & 0\cr 0 & b}$$ with $a> b > 1$. Then $\kappa(A) = a^2 > b^2 = \kappa(B)$ but $\kappa(B^{-1} A) = a^2 b^2 > \kappa(A)$.

What is true is that $\kappa(B^{-1} A) \le \kappa(A) \kappa(B)$.

EDIT: For an example with Toeplitz matrices, take

$$ A = \pmatrix{2 & 1\cr 1 & 2\cr},\ B = \pmatrix{3 & -1\cr -1 & 3\cr}, B^{-1} A = \pmatrix{7/8 & 5/8\cr 5/8 & 7/8\cr}$$ Then $\kappa(B^{-1} A) = 6 > \kappa(A) = 3 > \kappa(B) = 2$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Ok. I forgot to give the infomation that A and B are toeplitz and symmetric matrix. Is this can be true in this case? Thanks. @Robert Israel – user60343 Jan 31 '13 at 2:58

Your assertion is not true. If it's true, then for $B=I$, we would have $\kappa(A)<\kappa(A)$ for any positive definite Toeplitz matrix $A\not=I$.

For a nontrivial ($B\not=I$) example, consider $A=\begin{pmatrix}2&1\\1&2\end{pmatrix}$ and $B=\begin{pmatrix}1&-0.1\\-0.1&1\end{pmatrix}$. Both of them are positive definite and Toeplitz, but $\kappa(B^{-1}A)\approx 3.6667 > 3 = \kappa(A)>\kappa(B)=1.2222$.

share|cite|improve this answer
$B$ is not Toeplitz. – Robert Israel Jan 31 '13 at 7:35
@RobertIsrael Thanks. What a silly mistake. The wrong counterexample is now deleted. – user1551 Jan 31 '13 at 7:42
I see :( In my numerical simulation this was allways true, but I can' prove it. Also there is the relation sheep beetwen the matrices A i B (A is filtered autocorelation matrix of B - this is problem from digital signal proccessing ), but I havent't it in explicit form in this moment. I know my English is bad, I apologize fot it :) Thank you for this comments! @Robert Israel – user60343 Jan 31 '13 at 11:37

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.