Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Theorem 6.8(ii) p.41 in Matsumura's Commutative Ring Theory, says that if $A$ is a Noetherian ring, $M$ a finite $A$-module and $N=N_1 \cap \cdots \cap N_s$ an irredundant primary decomposition of a proper submodule $N$ with $Ass(M/N_i) = \left\{P_i \right\}$, then $Ass(M/N) = \left\{P_1, \cdots, P_s \right\}$, where $Ass(\cdot)$ stands for "associated primes".

According to my understanding, the proof does not use the fact that $M$ is a finite $A$-module. I would like to confirm that the statement of theorem 6.8(ii) is valid even if $M$ is not finite over $A$ (however $A$ must still be Noetherian).

share|cite|improve this question
It's probably the case that if you have an irr. primary decomposition the conclusion holds and the assumption that $M$ is finite ensures that every submodule has a primary decomposition. – JSchlather Jan 30 '13 at 20:44
My findings corroborate your assertion. – Manos Jan 30 '13 at 20:50
@YACP: Ok, if you make it an answer i will gladly vote and accept it. – Manos Feb 1 '13 at 15:28
up vote 2 down vote accepted


Everything follows from two facts. The first is the "short exact sequence property" of associated primes. That is, given a short exact sequence of $A$-modules, the $\Ass$ of the left module is contained in the $\Ass$ of the middle, and the $\Ass$ of the middle is contained in the union of the $\Ass$'es of the two sides. The second is the fact that any nonzero $A$-module has an associated prime (which in turn requires that $A$ be Noetherian).

First, to simplify notation, we may mod out by $N$ to assume that $N=0$, so that what you really have is an irredundant primary decomposition of the zero module.

Next, there is a natural homomorphism $$M \hookrightarrow \bigoplus_{i=1}^s M/N_i$$ that is injective since its kernel is $\bigcap_{i=1}^s N_i = 0$, and hence $\Ass M \subseteq \Ass \left(\bigoplus_{i=1}^s M/N_i\right) = \bigcup_{i=1}^s \Ass(M/N_i) = \{P_1, \ldots, P_s\}$ (where the first equality follows from induction on the short exact sequence property).

For the reverse containment, by symmetry it is enough to show that $P_1 \in \Ass M$. Consider the following composition of natural homomorphisms: $$ N_2 \cap \cdots \cap N_s \hookrightarrow M \twoheadrightarrow M/N_1. $$ This composition is an injection. Hence, $\Ass (N_2 \cap \cdots \cap N_s) \subseteq \Ass(M/N_1) = \{P_1\}$. But $N_2 \cap \cdots \cap N_s \neq 0$ (by irredundancy) and since any nonzero $A$-module has an associated prime, $\Ass (N_2 \cap \cdots \cap N_s) = \{P_1\}$. But since $N_2 \cap \cdots \cap N_s$ is a submodule of $M$, it follows that $P_1 \in \Ass M$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Nice answer! I have a question: in the end of your first paragraph you say "any nonzero A-module has an associated prime". Is this true if and only $A$ is Noetherian? Second question on notation: what does this double arrow stand for in the map $M \rightarrow M/N_1$? – Manos Feb 8 '13 at 15:58
1. I don't think that "if and only if" holds. There may well be non-Noetherian rings over which any nonzero module has an associated prime. However, it is true that this property holds when the ring is Noetherian. 2. The double arrow means "surjection". – neilme Feb 9 '13 at 8:29

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.