Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

enter image description here
I came across the above problem and my attempts are as follows: We see the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $t^2-{\rm trace} (A)t+\det(A)=0$ and hence $t^2- \lambda^2=0$ since ${\rm trace}(A)=0$ and $-\lambda^2=\det(A)>0$. Suppose $\lambda^2=-\alpha^2<0$ and so $\lambda=\pm i\alpha$. Thus $$y(t)=C_1\cos(\alpha t)+C_2\sin(\alpha t)$$ Now I do not know how to use the fact $y(0)=(0,1)^t$ . Can someone point me in the right direction?

share|improve this question
You have $y(t)$ as a scalar function, when the $y(t)$ in your DE is a vector. – JohnD Jan 30 at 3:06
Can you explain more elaborately,sir? How can I use this fact to come to any conclusion? – Sagarika Jan 30 at 3:34
You write $y(t)=C_1\cos(\alpha t)+C_2\sin(\alpha t)$ which is clearly a scalar function, not a vector. Yet the problem statement says $y(t)=(y_1(t),y_2(t))^T$ where I am using $^T$ for transpose. Also, the given initial condition is $y(0)=(0,1)^T$ which gains says that $y(t)$ is a vector-valued function. – JohnD Jan 30 at 3:38
So,using the fact $y(0)=(0,1)^t$ we get $y(0)=C_1=(0,1)^t$ and the value of $C_2$ remains undetermined. – Sagarika Jan 30 at 3:51

2 Answers

up vote 0 down vote accepted

Since the eigenvalues are pure imaginary, $\lambda=\pm\alpha i$, the general solution is of the form $$\mathbf{y}(t)=c_1\mathbf{v}_1\cos(\alpha t)+c_2\overline{\mathbf{v}}_1\sin(\alpha t).\tag{1}$$

This immediately rules out (1) and (2).

If (4) were true, then $c_1=c_2=0$, but then the initial condition $\mathbf{y}(0)=\begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix}$ is violated.

Hence, the answer is (3), and this makes sense based on the form of $(1)$.

share|improve this answer

You've done a nice work. Even if it is not possible to determine explicitly the two vectors $\mathrm C_1$ and $\mathrm C_2$, this give you the indication that the answer lies in $\{3, 4\}$. The only thing to prove now is that those two vectors cannot be zero.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.