Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The Laplace transform of a function $f(t)$ is a function that maps $\mathbb{C} \mapsto \mathbb{C}$.

$$f(s) = \int_0^\infty f(t)e^{-st}dt, \text{ with } s=x + iy$$

  1. Since $s = x + iy$ is complex, $e^{-s}$ can be written as $e^{-x}e^{-iy}$. Am I correct that this can be interpreted as an amplitude multiplied with an angle represented by the unit vector $e^{-iy}$? Or is it amplitude multiplied by frequency?

  2. What should the result of $f(s)$ be interpreted as?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

You interpretation of $e^{-s}$ is pretty much correct, at least if interpreted somewhat liberally. Now, if you fix $x$, we are looking at the Fourier transform of the function $t\mapsto f(t)e^{-xt}$. In that sense, $y$ is rightly interpreted as a frequency. So if you think you understand the Fourier transform, that gives you an idea what the Laplace transform means. However, the extra factor $e^{-xt}$ complicates things.

In practice, it doesn't seem fruitful to hunt for an interpretation of the Laplace transform. It is just a transform which changes operations like integration, differentiation, and convolution into simpler algebraic operations, and doesn't have a lot of meaning beyond that.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.