Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $A$ be a finite dimensional $\mathbb C$-algebra. Let $e_1,\ldots,e_r\in A$ be nonzero idempotents (with $r>0$), i.e. $e_i^2=e_i$. My question is: Can it happen that $e_1+\cdots+e_r=0$? I can't think of a single example.

Note: I do not require the $e_i$ to be central, primitive, or orthogonal.

share|cite|improve this question
Example: $e_1=e_2=\dots=e_r=0.$ – NikolajK Jan 29 '13 at 12:34
Ok, I inserted the appropriate edit ;) – Jesko Hüttenhain Jan 29 '13 at 12:35
Remark: Initially I tried to prove it just from the relation and using sqaring of the whole expression, you get to $\sum_{i\ne j=1}^{r-1}e_ie_j=-2 \sum_{i=1}^{r-1}e_i$. – NikolajK Jan 29 '13 at 14:06
@NickKidman: the general statement of the question is false in fields of positive characteristic, for example $1+1+1+1+1=0$ in the field of five elements. So there's no purely algebraic deduction. – Colin McQuillan Jan 29 '13 at 14:07
Hint: Embed $A$ in $L(A)\simeq M_n(\mathbb{C})$. Then the trace of an idempotent is equal to its rank. – 1015 Jan 29 '13 at 14:16
up vote 4 down vote accepted

We can WLOG assume that the algebra $A$ is embedded in $\mathrm{M}_n\left(\mathbb C\right)$ for some $n\in\mathbb N$ (because the $A$-module $A$ is faithful and finite-dimensional, so that $A$ is embedded in $\mathrm{End}_{\mathbb C} A \cong \mathrm{M}_n\left(\mathbb C\right)$ for $n=\dim_{\mathbb C}A$). Then, $e_1, e_2, \dots, e_r$ are idempotent matrices, and have idempotent sum (because $0$ is idempotent). According to MathOverflow question #115067, any finite list of idempotent matrices over $\mathbb C$ (or any other field of characteristic $0$) having idempotent sum must be a list of orthogonal idempotents. Hence, your idempotents $e_1, e_2, \dots, e_r$ are orthogonal. Thus, $e_1\left(e_1+e_2+\cdots+e_r\right) = e_1e_1 + e_1e_2 + \cdots + e_1e_r = e_1 + 0 + \cdots + 0 = e_1$. Since $e_1+e_2+\cdots+e_r=0$, this rewrites as $e_1\cdot 0 = e_1$, so that $e_1 = 0$. This contradicts the assumption that $e_1, e_2, \dots, e_r$ are nonzero idempotents.

share|cite|improve this answer
Even easier: the trace of a non-zero idempotent matrix is a positive integer, so their sum cannot be zero. – Colin McQuillan Jan 29 '13 at 12:51

Here is a proof which does not make use of the hypothesis that $A$ is finite-dimensional. It works over any field of characteristic $0$. Since $A$ acts on itself by left multiplication, it suffices to answer this question for idempotent endomorphisms $e_1, e_2, ... e_r$ of some vector space $V$ (not necessarily finite-dimensional). Let $V_1, V_2, ... V_r$ be the images of $e_1, e_2, \dots, e_r$. If $V_1 \cap V_2$ is nonzero, pick direct sum decompositions

$$V_1 \cong V_1' \oplus (V_1 \cap V_2)$$ $$V_2 \cong V_2' \oplus (V_1 \cap V_2)$$

so that $e_1 = e_1' + e_{1 \cap 2}$ and $e_2 = e_2' + e_{1 \cap 2}$ where $e_i'$ is the projection onto $V_i'$ and $e_{1 \cap 2}$ is the projection onto $V_1 \cap V_2$. Now $e_1 + e_2 = e_1' + e_2' + 2 e_{1 \cap 2}$ where all three idempotents appearing in this sum are orthogonal. Next, consider the intersections $V_1' \cap V_3, V_2' \cap V_3, V_1 \cap V_2 \cap V_3$, and continue decomposing the idempotents by choosing direct sum decompositions in this manner. In the end we will have written $e_1 + e_2 + \cdots + e_r$ as a sum, with positive integer coefficients, of nonzero orthogonal idempotents, and over a field of characteristic zero such a sum is clearly nonzero (e.g. because we can pick a nonzero vector in the image of each idempotent, and their sum is not sent to zero).

share|cite|improve this answer

Only for zero idempotents. There are several articles on sum of idempotents. See, for example, R. E. Hartwig, M. S. Putcha. When is a matrix a sum of idempotents? Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 26 (1990) 279--286, and for infinite dimensional case - C. Pearcy and D. M. Topping. Sums of small numbers of idempotents. Michigan Math. J. 14, (1967), 453--465. By the way, finite dimensional restriction is essential, since every bounded operator is a sum of 5 idempotents.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.