Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

While studying for an exam in complex analysis, I came across this problem. Unfortunately I was not able to solve it. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Let $U ⊂ \mathbb{C}$ be a domain and $f_1, . . . , f_n : U \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ holomorphic functions, such that $\sum_{k=1}^n \left| f_k(z) \right|$ is constant on $U$. Show that $f_1, . . . , f_n$ are constant.

share|cite|improve this question
Tip: Show it's true for $n=2$ and then use induction. – Dan Rust Jan 28 '13 at 17:40
Thanks, that's a great idea! – user59982 Jan 28 '13 at 17:42
@DanielRust - I'm a little frustrated that this problem has been closed as a duplicate, because the linked questions address something slightly different. The linked questions actually establish a "maximum principle" for $g(z) = \sum_{k=1}^n |f_k(z)|$. That, is the maximum of $g(z)$ occurs on the boundary of $U$. But this not the same as what we want to show here right? – JZShapiro Jun 25 '13 at 14:35
@DanielRust - Do you have any more tips for addressing the specific question here? I have been working on this question for a while. I do know that each individual $f_k$ satisfies a maximum principle--$|f_k(z)|$ having a local max in $U$ implies that $f_k(z)$ is constant. – JZShapiro Jun 25 '13 at 14:39
@DanielRust How do you transform $|f_1|+|f_2|+|f_3|$ into $|g_1|+|g_2|$ with still $g_1,g_2$ analytic? Unless I missed something, I don't think it is so obvious that induction helps. – 1015 Jun 25 '13 at 16:03

For simplicity, let's consider $n=2$. In $U$, we have $|f|+|g|=C$ for some constant. Fix a point $z_0$ in $U$. Then, for appropriately chosen unimodular constants

$$|\alpha f(z_0) +\beta g(z_0)|=|f(z_0)|+|g(z_0)|=C.$$

This means the holomorphic function $\alpha f(z) +\beta g(z)$ attains its maximum in $U$ (since the supremum in $U$ is at most $C$ by the triangle inequality, and it attains $C$), so it is a constant. So for all $z$, we have

$$|\alpha f(z) +\beta g(z)|=|f(z)|+|g(z)|.$$

Equality is only possible in the triangle inequality all the vectors point in the same direction. So $c(z)\alpha f(z) = \beta g(z)$ for some real holomorphic $c(z)$. But since real holomorphic functions are constant, $c$ is constant. Then $\alpha f(z) +\beta g(z)=(1+c)(\alpha f)$, and the latter is a holomorphic function that attains its maximum on $U$, so it is constant. So $f$ is constant, and it follows that $g$ is constant.

share|cite|improve this answer
Nicely done, +1. – 1015 Jun 25 '13 at 17:05
@julien Thanks! That means a lot coming from you. – Potato Jun 25 '13 at 17:08
I suddenly realize I am not sure about the last step. Your $c$ depends on $z$. So you probably need to do like Davide Giraudo, restrict to a ball where $f,g$ don't vanish (at least $f$). Then $c$ will be holomorphic real-valued whence constant. – 1015 Jun 25 '13 at 17:55
@julien Thanks for the correction. – Potato Jun 25 '13 at 18:10
@Potato Could you explain a little more why $c(z)$ is real valued? – Bilbo Nov 28 '15 at 19:13

The result would be easier to show if we would have as assumption that $\sum_{j=1}^n|f_j|^{\color{red}2}$ is constant (then we would take the derivative, and use Cauchy-Riemann equations, or as Julien suggest, the Laplacian).

To deal with this case, consider $z_0\in U$ and $r>0$ such that $B(z_0,r)$ contains none of the zeroes of the $f_k$ (if one is $0$, remove it, and in a ball there are finitely many zeroes of $f_k$). Then on this ball, using a determination of logarithm, we can find for each $k$, $g_k$ such that $f_k=g_k^2$ on $B(z_0,r)$ for some $g\in\mathcal O(B(z_0,r))$.

We get that each $g_k$ is constant on $B(z_0,r)$ (hence so is each $f_k$) and we conclude invoking again principle of isolated zeroes (and connectedness of $U$).

share|cite|improve this answer
For people slow like me, the first can be done taking the Laplacian $\Delta =4\frac{\partial^2}{\partial z\partial \overline{z}}$ which yields $0=\sum|f'_j|^2$ with the help of CR. Nice answer, +1. – 1015 Jun 25 '13 at 18:44
@julien Actually, the computations I suggest lead to similar as yours. – Davide Giraudo Jun 26 '13 at 14:11
I supposed so. I just commented because it took me a while to figure it out... – 1015 Jun 26 '13 at 15:15

To complete @Potato's solution, where he/she did the $n=2$ case, here's how the induction step can be done (I would have added this as a comment, but it's too long to post it as a comment):

Let $n \geq 3$ and $|f_1(z)| + \dots + |f_n(z)|=C$. Then we can choose an arbitrary $z_0 \in U$ and choose $w_1,\dots,w_n$ such that $|f_i(z_0)| = w_i f_i (z_0)$, $|w_i| = 1$.

Then by the same reason as above (in Potato's answer), $g(z) = w_1 f_1(z) + \dots + w_n f_n(z)$ is constant on $U$ (by the maximum principle because $|g(z)|$ attains a maximum at $z_0$.) In fact $g(z)=C$ for all $z \in U$. So $$C = |g(z)| \leq |w_1 f_1(z) + w_2 f_2(z)| + |f_3(z)| + \dots + |f_n(z)| \leq |f_1(z)| + \dots + |f_n(z)| = C$$ So by the induction hypothesis, the $n-1$ functions $(w_1 f_1 + w_2 f_2) , f_3 , \dots , f_n$ are all constant and by considering that $(w_1 f_1(z_0) + w_2 f_2(z_0) ) = |f_1(z_0)| + |f_2(z_0)|$ we can apply @Potato's reasoning again to conclude that $f_1$ and $f_2$ are also constant.

share|cite|improve this answer

Here is a different approach at the solution: Let $c = \sum_{i=1}^n |f_i| $ where c is a constant. For any holomorphic function $f$ we have the mean value theorem as $$ f(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0 ^{2\pi} f(z_0 + re^{i\theta}) d\theta \\ \implies |f(z_0)| \leq \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0 ^{2\pi} |f(z_0 + re^{i\theta})| d\theta$$ Hence $|f|$ is subharmonic and also $-|f|$ is superharmonic. Now we know that, $ |f_1| = c - \sum_{i=2}^n |f_i|$. This means that $|f_1|$ is both subharmonic as well as superharmonic or in other words $|f_1|$ is harmonic.

Thus the problem reduces to showing that if the modulus of a holomorphic function is harmonic then it is a constant. This can be shown in several ways.

1) One way would be to note that $|f|$ would follow the mean value theorem itself. Hence $$ |f(z_0)| = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0 ^{2\pi} |f(z_0 + re^{i\theta})| d\theta $$ Since this is true for any $r>0$ in $D(z_0,r)$, hence $ |f(z_0 + re^{i\theta})| = |f|$ is independent of $r = |z-z_0|$. This signifies that on all rays emanating from $z_0$, $|f|$ would be constant. This would violate the maximum value theorem for $f$ unless it is a constant.

2) A second approach is this: If $f$ is non-constant, then the derivative $f'$ has isolated zeroes. On a small disk away from the zeroes of $f'$, the function $f$ has a holomorphic inverse. The composition of a harmonic function with a holomorphic function is again harmonic, so composing with $f^{-1}$ reduces the problem to showing that the function $|z|$ is not harmonic in a neighborhood of the origin. But this conclusion is evident, since $|z|$ attains a global minimum at the origin.

Now that we have shown $|f_1|$ is a constant, we can keep repeating the process for any $f_i$ from $\tilde{c} = \sum_{i=2}^n |f_i|$ to show that each $f_i$ is a constant.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.