Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

How to prove this inequality: $$\ln \Gamma \left( x \right)-2\ln \Gamma \left( \frac{x+1}{2} \right)>\frac{2x}{3}$$ Sry I forgot to mention that $x>300$

share|cite|improve this question
Try plugging in $x=1$ to see what happens. – Byron Schmuland Jan 28 '13 at 13:41
@gauss115 - please revise the question, as Byron pointed out the statement as it stands is false. – nbubis Jan 28 '13 at 13:54
@nbubis sry! The condition is $x>300$ – gauss115 Jan 28 '13 at 14:00
How do you know this is true? What did you try to show this is true? – Did Jan 28 '13 at 14:06
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Another approach would be to use approximations. There is a quickly convergent version of Stirling's formula which goes like this:$$\ln{\Gamma(x)}=\left(x-\frac{1}{2}\right)\ln{x}-x+\frac{\ln{2\pi}}{2}+\frac{1}{12(x+1)}+O(x^{-2})$$ (see Derive upper and lower bound from this and plug back into your inequality. You'll end up with a relatively straightforward logarithmic inequality.

share|cite|improve this answer

Simply take the derivative of your function: $$f'(x) = \psi(x)-\psi\left(\frac{x+1}{2}\right)$$ And then show that $f''(x) >0$ and that $f'(x)>2/3$ for say $x=20$. This shows that the derivative is larger for all $x>20$.

Now calculate $f(300) > 200$ to prove that $f(x) > 2x/3$ for all $x>300$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.