Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I can't get this step in the geometric proof of Rodrigues' Rotation Formula --- It's claimed $\color{green}{NV = (\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{n}(\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{r}))\cos \phi} $ and $ \color{red}{VQ = (\mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{r})\sin\phi} $. The picture is below.

But $\cos\phi = \frac{\color{green}{NV}}{\color{blue}{NQ}}$ and $ \sin\phi = \frac{\color{red}{VQ}}{{\color{blue}{NQ}}} $ because $\color{blue}{NQ} $ is the hypothesis. How do they make their claim from this? Thanks a lot. enter image description here

share|improve this question
    
$NQ$ is (the length of) the hypotenuse (not the hypothesis). –  joriki Jan 28 '13 at 12:30

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

You've got several notational confusions there. First, what you denote by $\mathbf p$ in the first paragraph seems to be denoted by $\mathbf r$ in the rest of the post. More importantly, they're using expressions like $NV$ to refer to vectors, whereas in your expressions for $\cos\phi$ and $\sin\phi$ you're using them as the magnitudes of these vectors. If you multiply your equations through by $NQ$, you get the magnitudes of their equations (noting that both $\mathbf r-\mathbf n(\mathbf n\cdot\mathbf r)$ and $\mathbf n\times\mathbf r$ have length $NQ$ if $\mathbf n$ is a unit vector), and then you just have to check that the directions work out, too.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks - I corrected to r. I'll look at this later. –  Frank Muer Jan 28 '13 at 15:52

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.