Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The integral of the Sinc function over $\mathbb{R}$ is well-known, $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(x)}{x} dx = \pi$$But if I try to evaluate this using integration by parts, I get $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(x)}{x} dx = \left.-\frac{\cos(x)}{x} \right|_{-\infty}^{\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{\cos(x)}{x^2} dx$$ The first part is $0$, and the second part diverges.

What's going on? Is integration by parts just not kosher here? If so, why not?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The definite integration by parts formula

$$\int_a^b f(x) g(x)\ dx = F(x) g(x)\bigg|_a^b - \int_a^b F(x) g'(x)\ dx$$

is justified by the product rule for derivative and the fundamental theorem of calculus

$$\int_a^b (F g)'(x)\ dx = F(x) g(x) \bigg|_a^b $$

But the "fine print" there is that $F(x) g(x)$ is assumed to be continuously differentiable on the interval $(a,b)$ and continuous on $[a,b]$. In this case with $F(x) = -\cos(x)$ and $g(x) = 1/x$, $F(x) g(x)$ is undefined at $x=0$, and no definition of it there will make it continuous at $x=0$, let alone differentiable. So you can't use the integration by parts formula for this integral on any interval containing $0$.

share|improve this answer

The issue is the discontinuity at $0$ in the cosine terms when you perform the partial integration, which is overlooked if you integrate over $\mathbb{R}$. To get around this, consider:

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{\sin x}{x}dx=2\int_0^{\infty}\frac{\sin x}{x}dx$$

By parts:

$$\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(x)}{x} dx = \left.-\frac{\cos(x)}{x} \right|_{0}^{\infty} - \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\cos(x)}{x^2} dx$$

And here, both terms on the RHS diverge. No contradiction.

share|improve this answer
    
There is a discontinuity in $\cos(x)/x$, though not in $\sin(x)/x$. –  Robert Israel Jan 28 '13 at 6:26
    
@RobertIsrael I thought the OP meant a discontinuity at zero of the function $\sin x/x$. –  user38268 Jan 28 '13 at 6:27
    
@BenjaLim Sorry I realise that wasn't absolutely clear in my original post. –  L. F. Jan 28 '13 at 6:45
    
@L.F., this proof is not accurate. You can not integrate by parts since you have an integrand that is not convergent. If the denominator was $x^{-2}$, than okay, but this is not the case. –  Integrals Dec 15 '13 at 3:44
    
@Jeff I haven't proved anything $-$ please re-read the question. –  L. F. Dec 15 '13 at 3:48

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.