Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am in need of help figuring this out-- If the only straight lines in hyperbolic geometry are those that pass through the center, then isn't there a right angle? (horizontal and vertical) Which fulfills that requirement of the definition of a rectangle. That leaves the other two sides as hyperbolic lines with negative curve and extending infinitely, resulting in three acute angles, right? Aren't the two straight lines passing through the center parallel to their opposite hyperbolic line? Which also fulfills the definition of a rectangle.
I'm sure I am overlooking something or have gotten myself very confused. Please help.

share|cite|improve this question

It's not clear to me what you mean by "parallel" geodesic in the hyperbolic plane. Those that meet at an infinitely distant point?

Also, it is not clear what definition of rectangle you are using. One possible definition involves having four right angles. This cannot happen in the hyperbolic plane. Indeed, the sum of interior angles in every geodesic triangle is strictly less than $\pi$. Since any quadrilateral can be divided into two triangles, the sum of its interior angles is strictly less than $2\pi$.

share|cite|improve this answer

A very illuminating approach to this problem would be to look at Saccheri and Lambert quadrilaterals in the Hyperbolic plane. Depending on your background, you might consider using NonEuclid ( as a way to help you visualize the constructions and lines in the Hyperbolic plane.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.