Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It's a well known theorem that a set with finite outer measure is measurable if and only if its outer and inner measure agree.

I need to justify the assumption that the outer measure of the set is finite, i.e., an example of a non-measurable set with outer and inner measure both infinite.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

A simple way to do this is to take a non-measurable set $A \subseteq [0,1]$ and consider $B = ( - \infty , 0 ) \cup A \cup ( 1 , + \infty )$. Clearly the inner and outer Lebesgue measure of $B$ are infinite, and $B$ is also not measurable.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.