Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

So the standard cantor set has an outer measure equal to 0, but how can you construct a "fat" cantor set with a positive outer measure? I was told that it is even possible to produce one with an outer measure of 1! I don't see how changing the size of the "chuck" taken out will change the value of the outer measure. Regardless of the size, I feel like it will inevitably reach a value of 0 as well...

Are there other constraints that need to be made in order to accomplish this?

share|improve this question
7  
    
If the bits you remove at each stage have total length less than $1$, then what's left has positive measure. –  Gerry Myerson Jan 27 '13 at 4:06
    
You can't have outer measure 1. Otherwise the set would be dense in [0,1], contradicting its compactness. –  user53153 Jan 27 '13 at 4:09
    
You can, however, have outer measure arbitrarily close to one. –  Brian M. Scott Jan 27 '13 at 4:10
1  
Here are some details of what's contained on the Wikipedia page. –  Martin Jan 27 '13 at 4:13
show 1 more comment

1 Answer 1

Say you delete the middle third.

Then delete two intervals the sum of whose lengths is $1/6$ from the two remaining intervals.

Then delete intervals the sum of whose lengths is $1/12$, one from each of the four remaining intervals.

And so on. The amount you delete is $\displaystyle\frac13+\frac16+\frac{1}{12}+\cdots= \frac23.$ That is less than the whole measure of the interval $[0,1]$ from which you're deleting things.

share|improve this answer
    
@Lubin : You're right. I've modified the answer accordingly. –  Michael Hardy Jan 9 at 3:56
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.