Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a rather basic question about the dimension of a graph mapped by the exponential map. The problem is I can't really visualize it. It starts like that:

Let $M$ be a smooth manifold of dimension $n$. $$T_{x}M = E_{1x} \oplus E_{2x}, \ \dim E_{1x}=k, \ \dim E_{2x}=n-k$$ $$B^{i}(\delta(x)) = \{ u \in E_{ix}: \lVert{u\rVert} \leq \delta(x) \}, \ i = 1,2, \ 0 < \delta(x) < \infty$$ $$B(\delta(x)) = B^{1}(\delta(x)) \times B^{2}(\delta(x)), \ U(x,\delta(x)) = \exp_{x} B(\delta(x))$$ For a.e. $x \in M$: $\exists$ $\phi(x) \in C^{1+\alpha}(B^{1}(\delta(x)))$ with $\phi(x): B^{1}(\delta(x)) \to E_{2x}$ and $\phi(x)(0) = 0$, $d\phi(x)(0) = 0$.

From this follows the existence of a submanifold $V(x) = \{\exp_{x}(u,\phi(x)u): u \in B^{1}(\delta(x))\}$, where, of course, $(u,\phi(x)u) = \operatorname{graph}(\phi(x))$.

My question is: Why is $\dim V(x) = k$ and not $n$? I am getting confused since $\exp_{x}$ is a diffeomorphism and $\operatorname{dom}(\exp_{x}) = B^{1}(\delta(x)) \times \phi(x)(B^{1}(\delta(x)))$ and not just $B^{1}(\delta(x))$. Shouldn't $\dim V(x)$ be the same like $\dim U(x,\delta(x)$?

Further implying question would be why $T_{x}V(x) = E_{1x}$?

Maybe someone even got an example in $\mathbb{R}^{3}$ or some good script/book/reference...

Thanks in advance.

share|improve this question
    
Note that $\dim(V\otimes W) = (\dim V)(\dim W)$ and $\dim(U\oplus V) = \dim U + \dim V$. For dimensional reasons your decomposition of $T_xM$ is incorrect. I think you want $\oplus$, not $\otimes$. –  Michael Albanese Jan 26 '13 at 12:29
    
yes, I meant $\oplus$. edited. –  Michael Kohlhaas Jan 26 '13 at 13:26
    
I edited for readability. You should use \exp instead of exp, \dim instead of dim (LaTeX understands these operators), and as for less common operators, \operatorname{dom} and \operatorname{graph} does the job. Also, paragraph breaks are easier on the eyes than html br tag. –  user53153 Jan 27 '13 at 1:03

1 Answer 1

The set $\operatorname{graph}(\phi(x)) = \{(y,\phi(x)(y)): y\in B^1(\delta(x))\}$ is a subset $T_xM$, and more specifically a smooth submanifold of dimension $k$. Its parametrization by an open subset of $\mathbb R^k$ is given to us.

The exponential map $\exp_x $ is a diffeomorphism in a neighborhood of $0\in T_x(M)$, and as any diffeomorphism, it maps $k$-dimensional submanifolds onto $k$-dimensional submanifolds. The set $V(x)$ is the image of $k$-dimensional submanifold $\operatorname{graph}(\phi(x))$ under the exponential map.

Concerning $T_xV(x)=E_{1x}$: for each nonzero vector $v\in T_xV(x)$ there is a curve $\gamma:(-\epsilon,\epsilon)\to V(x)$ such that $\gamma(0)=v$. The composition $\tilde\gamma = (\exp_x)^{-1}\circ \gamma$ takes values in $E_{1x}$, hence its derivative is in $E_{1x}$. The chain rule for $\gamma = \exp_x\circ \tilde \gamma$ does the rest.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.