Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $G=SU(k)\times T^1$, $S$ a subgroup of the center of $SU(k)$ ($Z(SU(k)\cong \mathbb{Z}_k$) and $\eta$ a homomorphism from $S$ into $T^1$. Suppose $(S, \eta)$ denotes the subgroup of $G$ contains elements of the form $(s , \eta(s))$ for all $s\in S$. We know that $SO(2k)$ has some subgroups in the form $G/(S,\eta)$ (for example $U(k)$). It seems (for the reasons not mentioned here) $SO(2k)\times T^1$ has no subgroup in the above form (nontrivial $S$) which is not contained in $SO(2k)$, is it true?
*$SO(2k)\cong SO(2k)\times \{e\}$

share|cite|improve this question
I'm not sure I understand the question. There is always the subgroup $\{(-I, -1), (I,1)\}\cong \mathbb{Z}/2$ which is not contained in $SO(2k)$. If you're asking whether or not the quotient of $SO(2k)\times T^1$ by this subgroup is isomorphic to the quotient $SO(2n)/\pm I \times T^1$, I'd have to think about it. – Jason DeVito Jan 25 '13 at 13:00
My question is about the quotients of $G=SU(k)\times T^1$ by it's central subgroups in the form $(S,\eta )$ described above, precisely, can $(SU(k)\times T^1)/(S,\eta )$ be a subgroup of $SO(2k)\times T^1$ but not contained in $SO(2k)$? $S$ is a nontrivial subgroup of $Z(SU(k)$. – G.J. Jan 26 '13 at 7:08
Can $\eta$ be trivial? I think $SU(4)/\mathbb{Z}_4$ lies in $SO(15)$, but no smaller. – Jason DeVito Jan 26 '13 at 16:00
Yes, $\eta$ can be trivial. I guess representation theory (checking irreducible representations of smallest dimension for $SU(m)$) is very helpful to show that there is no such subgroup, but I have some troubles in details. – G.J. Jan 26 '13 at 20:13
Are you familiar with It gives a way of answering a lot of these kinds of questions. I'll post an answer in a second. – Jason DeVito Jan 26 '13 at 22:19

Since you allow $\eta$ to be trivial, a counterexample is provided by $G = SU(4)$ with $S = Z(SU(4))$.

So, in other words, I'm claiming $SU(4)/S \times T^1$ is not isomorphic to a subgroup of $SO(8)$. In fact, I'm claiming more: $SU(4)/S$ is not isomorphic to a subgroup of $SO(8)$. The proof will use some representation theory.

Recall the Dynkin Diagram of $SU(4)$ is $A_3$, consisting of 3 simple roots arranged in a line. For a general Lie group, the irreducible representations are uniquely characterized by their highest weight vector with can be given in terms of natural numbers over each of the 3 simple roots.

Using, computing the dimension of a module, we see that $SU(4)$ has exactly 3 irreducible representations of dimension less than or equal to $8$, given by putting $0$s over 2 of the simple roots and a 1 over the remaining simple root.

Putting a $1$ over either the first or last root gives a 4-d rep. The first of these is the standard rep while the second is the first precomposed with complex conjugation.

Said another way, the first rep is $A\cdot v = Av$ while the second is $A\cdot v = \overline{A} v$.

Putting a $1$ over the middle simple root corresponds to the representation given by the usual double cover $SU(4)\rightarrow SO(6)$.

General representation theory tells us that a sum of representations if real iff its a sum of real irreducible plus pairs of other representations and their conjugates. In particular, the only nontrivial homomorphisms from $SU(4)$ to $SO(8)$ are the standard homomorphism coming from interpreting $\mathbb{C}$ as $\mathbb{R}^2$ and the double cover $SU(4)\rightarrow SO(6)\subseteq SO(8)$.

Now, we simply need to check the kernels of both of these and make sure they are not all of $S$. But, the first homomorphism has trivial kernel and the second has kernel generated by $-I$, so neither is all of $S$. It follows that $SU(4)/S$ is not isomorphic to a subgroup of $SO(8)$.

(Incidentally, the adjoint action of $SU(4)$ on its algebra gives an embedding of $SU(4)/S$ into $SO(15)$. I'm not sure if this is the smallest $SO(n)$ it embeds into or not.)

share|cite|improve this answer
@DeVito: Thanks to your nice example. Its details was very helpful for me. This example encourage us, as I said at first, that such subgroup $G$ cannot exist. I need to check all possible situations (i.e. the homomorphism to be trivial or nontrivial) to get a general answer. – G.J. Jan 27 '13 at 7:57
@DeVito: The irreducible complex representations of the simply connected simple groups of are listed in the table 1 in link‌​, see also the discussion link, I think these will help to get general answer. – G.J. Jan 27 '13 at 8:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.