Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am learning about Fourier series in class and the basic form of a Fourier Series is

$$a_{0}+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} [a_{n}\cos(nx)+b_{n}\sin(nx)]$$

so a fourier series should have an infinity number of terms.

I was reading the book and it says that the fourier series of $\cos^{2}(3x)$ is $\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}\cos(6x)$. I am assuming the $\frac{1}{2}$ is the $a_{0}$ term. If this is the fourier series, why does it not have an infiniti number of terms like the form above? Why does it only stop at one term after the $\frac{1}{2}$ term?

share|cite|improve this question
A Fourier series, though represented as an infinite sum, doesn’t necessarily have to contain infinitely many non-zero coefficients. It can be that only a finite number of coefficients are non-zero. – Haskell Curry Jan 25 '13 at 7:10
Any finite sum is a (somewhat trivial) special case of a series. – Jyrki Lahtonen Feb 23 '13 at 14:48
The FT of sin($x$) has only a single nonzero coefficient. – alancalvitti Feb 23 '13 at 15:12

Well, you can still think of it as having an infinite number of terms, just that most terms are zero.

For a similar example, consider the Taylor series of $1 + x + x^2$. Since everything past the second derivative is zero, all the coefficients of terms with power greater than $2$ are zero, so the series expansion is just the function itself. A similar thing is happening with the Fourier transform: $\cos^2(3x)$ is orthogonal to the terms whose coefficients are not $a_0$ and $a_6$, so their contribution to the Fourier decomposition is zero.

share|cite|improve this answer

It doesn't stop. They are just all zero. $a_n = 0$. So you can write $\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}cos(6x) + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 \dots$ if you want.

share|cite|improve this answer
I wonder if $\tfrac12 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + \tfrac12 \cos(6x) + 0 + 0 + 0 + \cdots$ gets the point across better. OP also sounds slightly uncertain about sigma notation. – Erick Wong Jan 25 '13 at 13:15

One 'practical' reason could be, that the function, you are trying to approximate using a sinusoidal series is itself a sinusoidal function. So it is not an approximation but an exact description. cos^2 3x = 1/2 + cos 6x/2 (using the trig identity).

The same thing happens with polynomial functions, when you try to approximate them with Taylor series. (Taylor series approximation is nothing but, trying to approximate a function using a polynomial.)

share|cite|improve this answer

Let's say you want to expand a function $f$ using whatever basis functions (call them $b_n$). Then if your $f$ is already a linear combination of a finite number of $f_n$'s you expansion will be finite too. It works both ways. Finite linear combination means finite expansion and finite expansion means finite linear combination.

In the case of fourier series, the basis functions are sines and cosines. Since you are getting only a finite expansion, then your function is made up of a bunch of (finite number of) sines and cosines. It doesn't matter what it may "look" like.

Same thing happens with Taylor expansion. When using Taylor expansions, the basis functions are $1,x,x^2,x^3,x^4,...$ so if a function had a finite Taylor expansion then it itself must be a polynomial. And its true, polynomials (and only polynomials) have a finite Taylor expansion. Just for giggles, try $f(x)=\cos(3\arccos(x))$. You will see that it has a finite Taylor expansion and hence it is a polynomial.

share|cite|improve this answer

Because your function is actually a finite linear combination of terms like those appearing in Fourier series. There is no magic involved: if you compute all coefficients you will find that most are zero. The series has infinitely many terms, but all but a finite number of them vanish.

For a simpler example, try to find the Fourier series of $\cos(17x)$.

share|cite|improve this answer

A related problem. Notice that, $b_n=0$, since the integrand $\sin(nx)\cos^{2}(3x)$ is an odd function on the interval $[-\pi,\pi]$. For $a_n$, we have

$$ a_n = \frac{2}{\pi}\,{\frac {\sin \left( \pi \,n \right) \left( {n}^{2}-18 \right) }{n \left( {n}^{2}-36 \right) }}.$$

From the above, you can see that $a_n=0,\forall n\neq 6 $. To Find $a_6$, just take the limit of the above expression as $n \to 6.$

See here for formulas for $a_n$ and $b_n$.

share|cite|improve this answer
$\lim\limits_{n\to0}a_n=1$ – robjohn Jun 3 '13 at 22:55

The fourier decomposition of the function $$f(x) = a_{0}+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} [a_{n}\cos(nx)+b_{n}\sin(nx)]$$ is just the original function $$a_{0}+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} [a_{n}\cos(nx)+b_{n}\sin(nx)].$$

If the sequences $a_n$, $b_n$ are always zero after finitely many nonzero terms then you will have a finite decomposition, exactly as in your example.

Functions of this type are called "trigonometric polynomials".

share|cite|improve this answer

Actually, the Fourier series of periodic functions that are smooth (no discontinuity and no sharp corners) is finite. In other words, all smooth periodic functions can be represented as a trigonometric polynomial.

Since your function is smooth, its Fourier series is finite. Even smooth periodic functions as peculiar as $f(x)=sin(\sin x)$ or $f(x)=e^{\sin x}$ have a finite fourier series expantions.This is such a curious and interesting property of smooth periodic functions!

Source of the first paragraph: Physics: Foundations and Applications, by Robert M. Eisberg and Laurence Lerner.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is clearly not true. If $c_k$ decays sufficiently fast as $k \to \infty$ (for example faster than any polynomial), the Fourier series is the Fourier series of a smooth ($C^\infty$) periodic function. – mrf Nov 4 '15 at 9:48
You are right! Seems like Eisberg was wrong. Or at least, not exact. I actually could find examples which disproved my first comment a few minutes ago. – Mohamad Emami Nov 4 '15 at 10:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.