Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am currently working through Knapp's Basic Real Analysis. I am currently working in Chapter 5 on "Lebesgue Measure and Abstract Measure Theory." The book states the following, giving Lebesgue Measure as an example of a measure.

"$\bf{Lebesgue \ Measure}$ $m$ on the ring $R$ of elementary sets of $\mathbb{R}$. If $E$ is a finite disjoint union of bounded intervals, we let $m(E)$ be the sum of the lengths of the intervals...Consider the case that $J=I_{1} \cup...\cup I_{r}$ disjointly with $I_{k}$ extending from $a_{k}$ to $b_{k}$, with or without endpoints. Then we can arrange the intervals in order so that $b_{k}=a_{k+1}$ for $k=1,...,r-1$."

I believe that I am misunderstanding something. If the union of the intervals is disjoint, how can it be that $b_{k}=a_{k+1}$? Then, wouldn't $I_{k} \cap I_{k+1}\neq \emptyset$? This seems counterintuitive, and any help would be much appreciated.

share|cite|improve this question
$(0,1]$ is disjoint from $(1,2]$. –  Andrés Caicedo Jan 24 '13 at 22:54
@Andres: That should be an answer. –  Rahul Jan 24 '13 at 23:23

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

There are several ways we can have disjoint intervals with coinciding end-points. For example, we could have an interval $(a,b)$ or $(a,b]$ next to an interval $(b,c)$. If points are admitted as intervals, $[a,a]=\{a\}$, then we could have situations such as $(a,b)$ next to $\{b\}$ next to $(b,c)$, etc.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.