Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have the following two questions on rings of polynomials. They seemed similar enough that I thought I'd go ahead and group them here as opposed to making separate listings for them. The questions are:

($1$) Determine whether or not the ring of polynomials in $z$ whose first $k$ derivatives vanish at the origin for some fixed positive integer $k$ is Noetherian.

($2$) Determine whether or not the ring of polynomials in $z$ and $w$ whose partial derivatives with respect to $w$ vanish for $z=0$ is Noetherian.

Note that $z$ and $w$ are complex variables, that is, the polynomials are over $\Bbb C$.

My work: It seemed like I could view each of these as subrings of $\Bbb C[z]$ and $\Bbb C[z,w]$, and since both of these are Noetherian, I wanted to conclude that each of the above were Noetherian, but I realized it isn't necessarily the case that a subring of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian. Can anyone offer some help for me? Thanks!

share|cite|improve this question
This is Exercise 7.4 iv) & v) from Atiyah and MacDonald, Commutative Algebra. – user26857 Jan 25 '13 at 2:26
Similar question: – user26857 Feb 4 '13 at 10:48
up vote 5 down vote accepted

(1) $R=\mathbb C+X^{k+1}\mathbb C[X]$, and this is a subring of $\mathbb C[X]$. Furthermore, the extension $R\subset \mathbb C[X]$ is finite and $\mathbb C[X]$ is noetherian, hence $R$ is noetherian. (An elementary approach: set $S=\mathbb C[X^{k+1}]$. Then $R$ is a finitely generated $S$-module (generated by $1,X^{k+2},\dots,X^{2k+1}$), and therefore $R$ is a noetherian $S$-module. It follows that $R$ is a noetherian ring.)

(2) $R=\mathbb C[X]+X\mathbb C[X,Y]$. This ring is not noetherian since the ideal $I=X\mathbb C[X,Y]$ is not finitely generated. Assume by contrary that $I$ is finitely generated and let $Xf_1(X,Y),\dots,Xf_n(X,Y)$ be a system of generators. Then every element of $I$, say $Xg(X,Y)$, can be written as follows: $$Xg(X,Y)=Xf_1(X,Y)[a_1(X)+Xb_1(X,Y)]+\cdots+Xf_n(X,Y)[a_n(X)+Xb_n(X,Y)].$$ Then $$g(X,Y)=f_1(X,Y)[a_1(X)+Xb_1(X,Y)]+\cdots+f_n(X,Y)[a_n(X)+Xb_n(X,Y)].$$ Now we send $X$ to $0$ and get $$g(0,Y)=f_1(0,Y)a_1(0)+\cdots+f_n(0,Y)a_n(0).$$ This shows that every polynomial of $\mathbb C[Y]$ can be written as a linear combination of $f_1(0,Y),\dots,f_n(0,Y)$ with complex coefficients, a contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer
This may be a dumb question, but it seems like we're viewing $\mathbb{C}[Y]$ as a $\Bbb C$-module? Is that correct? Is that why it can't be finitely generated? – anon271828 Jan 25 '13 at 22:40
That is why I was asking. Maybe I'm just not grasping the conceptual difference between modules and what you currently have. We can think of the $f_i$'s as a basis for $\Bbb C[Y]$? – anon271828 Jan 26 '13 at 0:10
Then why does it follow that everything in there can be written as a linear combination? Isn't that what a basis is? Err... Almost a basis. I guess it may not be linearly independent, but the linear combination part is what has me hung up, I guess. – anon271828 Jan 26 '13 at 0:44

In question (1) the ring obtained for $k=1$ is $S=\mathbb C+z^2\mathbb C[z]$.
That ring is noetherian because it is isomorphic to $\mathbb C[X,Y]/(Y^2-X^3)$ : can you show that?

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.