For example the variance in the log-odds is $0.07$ $(0.01)$, and the mean log-odds is $-0.65$ $(0.03)$. Just transforming this variance to probability given me $0.51$. So if the probabilities have a variation of $0.51$, the standard deviation is then $0.7$, which would make the $95\%$ coverage bound wider than $1$, which is impossible for probabilities.
Another idea was to calculate the $95\%$ coverage bounds of my log-odds:
$$−0.65 \pm [1.96\cdot\sqrt{0.07}] = [−1.19,−0.15]$$ If I transform these to probabilities:
$$\large \frac{\exp(x)}{1+\exp(x)}=[0.23,0.46]$$
So the $95\%$ range is actually only $0.23$ or $23\%$.
Could someone explain me why this first calculation was wrong, and whether the second is correct?