Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow(\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R})$ be a function mapping a real number uniquely into the set $\mathbb{F}$ of total functions from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}$. $\mathbb{F}$ is a topological space with the following definition of a neighborhood topology $\mathbf{N}_\mathbf{y}:\mathbb{F}\rightarrow2^\mathbb{F}$ for a fixed tuple $\mathbf{y}\in \mathbb{R}^n$:

$$\mathbf{N}_\mathbf{y}(g)=\{\{g'\mid g'\in\mathbb{F},\;\sum^n_{i=1}|g(\mathbf{y}_i)-g'(\mathbf{y}_i)|\leq r\}\mid r\in\mathbb{R}\}$$ (ie. for every $r \in \mathbb{R}$ the set of functions whose accumulated abs. difference to $g$ sampled at $n$ fixed points is not greater than $r$)

Then, can I say that the range of $f$ is a 1-dimensional submanifold of $\mathbb{F}$?

Is it if I add the constraint that $f(x)(y)$ is continuous in $x$ for every fixed $y\in\mathbb{R}$? My intuition is that then it is a submanifold because $f$ is invertible (wrt. its range) and because it is topology-preserving due to $f(x)(y)$ being continuous in $x$.

But honestly I'm not sure if that's enough or even correct; I don't know a lot about topology (yet).

share|improve this question
2  
Before mentioning submanifolds, you should first be more precise about the space in which it lies. So what's the topology on the space of maps $\mathbf{R^n}\to\mathbf{R}$? Do you really want all maps or just continuous ones? –  ZulfiqarIII Jan 24 '13 at 11:54
    
Just to illustrate what @ZulfiqarIII said: if you choose the discrete topology on the set of functions, it will not admit any subspace homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}$ (continuous function from $\mathbb{R}$ to any discrete space is single-valued). –  Willie Wong Jan 24 '13 at 12:08
1  
Thanks for the comments; they prompted me to think about the question more deeply. I've simplified and added a definition of topology for functions from $\mathbf{R}$ to $\mathbf{R}$. –  Johannes Bauer Jan 24 '13 at 13:48
    
"because $f$ is reversible"... do you mean invertible? and why is this true? –  user53153 Jan 24 '13 at 19:47
    
Oops. Yes, invertible. I'm correcting that. It is (wrt. its range), because I said it maps a real uniquely into $\mathbb{F}$. I'll also make that `wrt. its range' part clearer although I don't know if that's correct terminology. –  Johannes Bauer Jan 25 '13 at 7:45

1 Answer 1

up vote 0 down vote accepted

If you take your definition of $\mathbb{F}$, with the neighborhoods $\mathbf{N}_y$, then $\mathbb{F}$ is not Hausdorff, and you can get counterexamples pretty easily.

Let $z\in\mathbb{R}$ such that $z$ is not one of the $y_i$. Let $\phi$ be a bump function on $\mathbb{R}$ such that $\phi(z) = 1$ and $\phi(y_i) = 0$ for every $y_i$.

Let $f(x)(y) = x\phi(y)$. Since $f(x)(z) = x$ we see that $f$ is injective.

On the other hand, since $f(x)(y_i) = 0$ for every $y_i$ we have that the induced topology on $f(\mathbf{R}) \subset \mathbb{F}$ is the indiscrete topology. Hence $f(\mathbf{R})$ can not be locally or globally homeomorphic to $\mathbf{R}$, and it is not a manifold (and hence not a submanifold).

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks. Still digest that and trying to see what it means for my case (using self-organizing maps in order to learn the mapping from manifolds to $\mathbf{R}^n$). –  Johannes Bauer Jan 25 '13 at 11:52

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.