Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Adams'book:Sobolev Spaces, I know that if $kp>n,\Omega\subset R^n$ is boundary domain and has cone property, then $W^{k,p}(\Omega)$ could see as a banach algebra. My question is that does it hold for the one-dimensional and $p=2$ case, namely, for $H^k(0,1)$ ? If it is not true, provide a counterexample please.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

You have $n=1$, $k\ge 1$, and $p=2$. The condition $kp>n$ holds. The domain $(0,1)$ has the cone property in appropriate interpretation, since it is convex. The reason to introduce the cone property is to ensure that the boundary can be easily reached from inside; there is no difficulty in reaching the boundary of $(0,1)$.

Thus, even though the case $n=1$ is not necessarily mentioned by Adams, the result applies.

share|improve this answer
    
@ 5PM: Your answer is that $H^k(0,1),k\geqslant 1$ is a Banach algebra, but there is no need to use Adams' results. Am I right? ^-^ –  Darry Jan 24 '13 at 1:42
    
@Darry Yes, you are right: the good old Leibniz rule is enough. $$(fg)^{(k)} = \sum_j \binom{k}{j}f^{(j)} g^{(k-j)}$$ where all terms are square summable, because $f^{(j)}$ and $g^{(j)}$ are bounded for $j<k$. –  user53153 Jan 24 '13 at 1:55
    
@ 5PM: Thank you for your answer! –  Darry Jan 25 '13 at 0:47

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.