Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The definition of an "isogonal mapping" in $R^2$ is as follows.

Let $D$ be a domain in $R^2$. An isogonal mapping $f:D\to R^2$ is a transformation that preserves the magnitudes of local angles, but not their orientation.

Question: A continuous isogonal mapping $f:D\to R^2$ is necessarily holomorphic or anti-holomorphic on $D$?

I believe the answer should be known "yes" but I donot find the proof in a suitable literature. I wish to know how to prove it.

EDIT. $f$ maps $C^1$ curves to $C^1$ curves, then "$f$ preserves the magnitudes of local angles" is well-defined as well as the angles. We donnot assume that $f$ is differentiable in advance.

share|cite|improve this question
You should clarify what it means to "preserve the magnitudes of local angles" when $f$ is not necessarily differentiable. For differentiable maps this question has been answered. – user53153 Jan 23 '13 at 19:55

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.