Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Claim: $\displaystyle \bigcup_{a,b \in \mathbb{Q}}[a,b)$ is a Borel set.
Solution: I arrive at $[a,b)=\displaystyle \bigcap_{a,b \in \mathbb{Q}}(a-\frac{1}{n},b)$. This means that $[a,b)$ is a countable intersection of open sets. Also, $\displaystyle \bigcup_{a,b \in \mathbb{Q}}[a,b)=\displaystyle \bigcup_{a,b \in \mathbb{Q}} \left(\displaystyle \bigcap_{a,b \in \mathbb{Q}}(a-\frac{1}{n},b)\right)$.

My question is: out of these arguments, can we say that $\displaystyle \bigcup_{a,b \in \mathbb{Q}}[a,b)$ is a Borel set? How? Any help is greatly appreciated.

share|improve this question
2  
Well, $\bigcup_{a,b \in \mathbb{Q}}[a,b)$ is the whole real line. –  Byron Schmuland Jan 23 '13 at 17:00

1 Answer 1

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Your first argument is a little flawed: I take it that you meant $$ [a,b)=\bigcap_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\left(a-\frac{1}{n},b\right) $$ which shows that $[a,b)$ is a countable intersection of open sets and hence it is an element of the Borel $\sigma$-field (i.e. is a Borel set). Is this clear?

Now to show that $$ \bigcup_{a,b\in\mathbb Q}[a,b) $$ you just have to note that it is a countable union of Borel sets and hence it is itself a Borel set. This is by the definition of a $\sigma$-field.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you sir Stefan. –  Philip Benj Marcoby Eragon Jan 23 '13 at 9:54
    
You are welcome. –  Stefan Hansen Jan 23 '13 at 9:55

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.