Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$F$ is a field and $F[X^2, X^3]$ is a subring of $F[X]$, the polynomial ring. I need to show that nonzero prime ideals of $F[X^2, X^3]$ are maximal.

A classmate suggested taking a nonzero prime ideal $\mathfrak{p}$ of $F[X^2, X^3]$ and embedding $F[X^2,X^3]/\mathfrak{p} \hookrightarrow F[X]/(\mathfrak{p})$ and ultimately showing that $R/\mathfrak{p}$ was a field, but the proof we discussed was quite convoluted and it's not even apparent to me that that is an injective map. I'm inclined to think there's a shorter, more direct approach.

Does anyone see one? It's not imperative that I find a shorter or nicer proof, but seeing another approach can't hurt and I'm sure the grader would appreciate an easy-to-follow proof.

Thank you kindly.

share|cite|improve this question
Any integral domain of Krull dimension $1$ has the property you are looking for. It follows from both answers below that $\dim F[X^2,X^3]=1$. – user26857 Jan 23 '13 at 15:43

The ring $F[X]$ is an integral extension of $F[X^2,X^3]$ because $X$ is the root of the polynomial $t^2 - X^2 \in (F[X^2,X^3])[t]$. Now let $\mathfrak{p}$ be a prime ideal of $F[X^2,X^3]$. By the Lying - over theorem (Proposition 5.10 of Atiyah - Macdonald) we get that there is $\mathfrak{q}$ a prime ideal of $F[X]$ such that $\mathfrak{q} \cap F[X^2,X^3] = \mathfrak{p}$. However $F[X]$ is a PID hence $\mathfrak{q}$ is maximal and so $\mathfrak{p}$ is also maximal.

share|cite|improve this answer
How does this always happen to me. – JSchlather Jan 23 '13 at 6:07
@JacobSchlather Both of us had exactly the same idea! – user38268 Jan 23 '13 at 6:08
@uncookedfalcon No need to use going-up; look at Corollary 5.8 of Atiyah - Macdonald. – user38268 Jan 23 '13 at 6:16
a good point - thanks man :p (+1) – uncookedfalcon Jan 23 '13 at 6:17

This is probably overkill. Notice that the extension $F[X^2,X^3] \subset F[X]$ is an integral extension. This follows because $X$ satisfies the equation $t^2-X^2 \in F[X^2,X^3][t]$ and clearly $F[X]=F[X^2,X^3][X]$. Now suppose that some non-zero prime ideal $\mathfrak p$ of $F[x^2,x^3]$ is not maximal then we have a proper chain of ideals $(0) \subsetneq \mathfrak p \subsetneq \mathfrak q$. Which would imply by the Going Up theorem that we can find a chain of prime ideals $(0) \subsetneq \mathcal P \subsetneq \mathcal Q$ in $F[X]$. This is clearly impossible.

share|cite|improve this answer
@BenjaLim, Thanks I like yours as well. It reminds me of something, but I'm not quite sure what. – JSchlather Jan 23 '13 at 6:10
Our answers upto isomorphism are the same, because IIRC the Going-up Theorem is just an extension of the Lying-over theorem. – user38268 Jan 23 '13 at 6:13
I've never heard of the Going Up theorem/property before, but I like it! Thank you to both of you! – JoeDub Jan 23 '13 at 6:19
@JoeDub Do you have Atiyah - Macdonald? All the results that Jacob and I have used can be found in Chapter 5. – user38268 Jan 23 '13 at 6:20
I don't - just Hungerford and Dummit & Foote. Wikipedia has a nice breakdown of it all, though. – JoeDub Jan 23 '13 at 6:25

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.