Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $\Omega$ be a finite probability space and define the Total Variation as $TV(\mu,\nu):=\sup\{|\mu(A)-\nu(A)|: A\in\Omega\}$. One can also derive that


I know how to derive this fact by showing $\leq$ and $\geq$, however, I am interested if there is a direct way of deriving this. My hope is that such a direct proof would hint at the intuition behind maximizing over the largest event, compared to looking at the total sum of differences.

share|cite|improve this question
Did you get something out of the answer below? If this is so, you might accept it. – Did Apr 7 '11 at 8:26
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The supremum is reached at $A=\{x\in\Omega\,;\,\mu(x)\ge\nu(x)\}$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Or it's complement. I see, thanks! – SKS Mar 21 '11 at 20:45
@Sam At both, and at a few others like $A'=\{x\in\Omega\,;\,\mu(x)>\nu(x)\}$, really. – Did Mar 21 '11 at 21:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.