Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X$ be a smooth projective complex variety and $\mathcal{F}$ a coherent sheaf on $X$.

Let $\tau$ be a Grothendieck topology and $$ \chi(X,\mathcal{F},\tau)=\sum_i(-1)^i dim_{\mathbb{C}}H^i_\tau(X,\mathcal{F}) $$ the Euler characteristic of $(X,\mathcal{F},\tau)$.

For a compact closed and connected manifold $\bar X$, the Euler characteristic is $$ \chi(\bar X)=\sum_i(-1)^i rank_{\mathbb{Z}}H^i(\bar X,\mathbb{Z}). $$ Note that we may also use singular homology instead of singular cohomology. The number $rank_{\mathbb{Z}}H^i(\bar X,\mathbb{Z})$ is the number of $\mathbb{Z}$-factors of the group $H^i(\bar X,\mathbb{Z})$, the $i$-th Betti number of $X$. This number equals $dim_{\mathbb{C}}(H^i(\bar X,\mathbb{Z})\otimes\mathbb{C})$. This should be the same as $dim_{\mathbb{C}}H^i(\bar X,\mathbb{C})$ if I am not mistaken.

To the variety $X$ we can associate its analytification $\bar X$.

How do $\chi(X,\mathcal{F},\tau)$ and $\chi(\bar X)$ relate?

This question rises from this one where it is said that there is no nice relation for $\tau$ the Zariski topology. In the answers however, a connection with the etale topology and $F=\mathcal{O}_X$ the structure sheaf is suggested. What is this connection precisely? I remember vaguely that one should take finite coefficients somewhere, but I don't see where and why. In this case there is no such direct connection between singular homology and cohomology which makes the thing even more difficult for me to understand.

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.