Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm trying to prove that $\displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \dfrac{x}{|x|}$ doesn't exist using epsilon-delta definition. I know i'm supposed to assign a value to epsilon and assume $\displaystyle\lim_{x \to 0} \dfrac{x}{|x|} = L$ and work backwards to get delta. But I'm now stuck on finding delta.

share|improve this question
1  
You don't have to choose a delta. Instead, for each real number – each candidate for the limit – you have to choose an epsilon and show for every positive delta that the delta-neighbourhood of $0$ isn't taken to that epsilon-environment of that candidate. This means, no matter how close you come to $0$, you won't come as close as the chosen $\varepsilon$ to the limit candidate. –  k.stm Jan 20 '13 at 23:09

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

First note that the function you are considering is: $$ f(x) = \frac{x}{\lvert x \rvert} = \begin{cases}1 & \text{for }x>0 \\ -1 & \text{for } x<0\end{cases}. $$ (So the function is not defined at $0$.)

Now let $\epsilon= \frac{1}{2}$ be given. You want to prove that there does not exist an $L\in\mathbb{R}$ and a $\delta > 0$ such that if $\lvert x \rvert < \delta$ then $\lvert f(x) - L\rvert < \epsilon = \frac{1}{2}$. Assume that such did exist. So then for $x\in (-\delta , \delta)$, you would have $$ \lvert f(x) - L\rvert < \epsilon = \frac{1}{2}. $$ That is, you have for all $x\in (-\delta, \delta)$ that $$ -\frac{1}{2} < f(x) - L < \frac{1}{2}. $$ In particular for $x= \pm\frac{\delta}{2}$ you get the two equations $$ -\frac{1}{2} < -1 - L < \frac{1}{2} \\ -\frac{1}{2} < 1 - L < \frac{1}{2}. $$ So you get $$ \frac{1}{2} < - L < \frac{3}{2} \\ -\frac{3}{2} < -L < -\frac{1}{2}. $$ But that obviously doesn't work.

Here is my challenge to you: redo this with $\epsilon = 1$.

share|improve this answer

Hint: $|x|=-x$ when $x<0$ and $|x|=x$ when $x>0$. Now calculate the limit from the left and from the right. Do they match? What does this imply?

share|improve this answer
    
@Yunhui Shi Another hint: Draw the function $x \mapsto \tfrac{x}{\lvert x \rvert}$, have a look at it, and then choose your $\varepsilon$ wisely. Clayton, he wants to do this by epsilon-delta. –  k.stm Jan 20 '13 at 23:05
    
@K.Stm.: This argument shows him exactly what $\varepsilon$'s he can pick. From there, this argument validates the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ proof he wants. –  Clayton Jan 20 '13 at 23:07
    
Ah, right. That's the hint. –  k.stm Jan 20 '13 at 23:12

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.