Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Why do we include the $e^{k}$?

Wouldn't it be easier to simply use $f(t)=ap^{t}$ where $p$ is the percentage increase per time.

Is there a reason why the convention is to use $f(t)=ae^{kt}$?

share|improve this question
1  
Shouldn't those be $f(t)$ rather than $x$? –  Karolis Juodelė Jan 20 '13 at 19:24
    
Oops, you're right. I'll change it right now. –  Linksku Jan 20 '13 at 19:26
    
It is not widely known, but growth and decay problems led to the name of an important modern area of study, Grothendieck K-theory. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grothendieck_group and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-theory –  Will Jagy Jan 20 '13 at 21:18
    
P.S. say them out loud... –  Will Jagy Jan 20 '13 at 21:27
add comment

1 Answer 1

See also: What's so "natural" about the base of natural logarithms?

The choice of base is arbitrary, but the primary reason is likely that the defining equation for the system looks like $$\frac{df}{dt}=kf.$$ This means that the rate of growth of the population is proportional (proportionality $k$) to the population at a given time. The solution is $f(t)=ae^{kt}$. It can be re-expressed as you said, but there is no benefit.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.