Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

$$Y(\tau)=\int_{0}^{\tau} t\frac{dF}{dt}dt \:\:\:\:\:\: ; \:\:\: Y(0)=0$$ $$X(\tau)=F(\tau) \:\:\:\:\:\: ; \:\:\: X(0)=0$$

$$Q(X(\tau))=\int_{X(0)}^{X(\tau)} Y(t)dX$$

First real quick: Can I get away with $\int t \: dF=tF(t)$? (Pretty sure not)

Assuming the answer to this is no, I am trying to avoid an expression for $Q(X(t))$ that involves twice integrating, or any integration in general that will result in a huge complicated equation. For example, I prefer to deal with $\int F \: dt$ rather than $\int t \: dF$.

So, is it possible to use integration by parts to express $Q(X(\tau))$ in the following way:

$$Y(\tau)=\tau F(\tau)-\int_{0}^{\tau} F(t)dt$$

$$Q(X(\tau))=Y(\tau)X(\tau)-\int_{X(0)}^{X(\tau)} \frac{dY}{dX}dX$$

$$=Y(\tau)(X(\tau)-1)$$

Substituing in for $Y(\tau)$ and $X(\tau)=F(\tau)$:

$$Q(X(\tau))=(\tau F(\tau)-\int_{0}^{\tau} F(t)dt)(F(\tau)-1)$$

Is that allowed? I'm open to suggestions for better expressions.

share|improve this question
3  
It's rather confusing to use the same letter for a free variable and a bound one. –  joriki Jan 20 '13 at 17:15
    
@joriki Duly edited. How about now? –  ben Jan 20 '13 at 21:49
    
It got worse. You're still using $t$ both for a free variable and a bound one, except now you're not even mentioning the free variable in the integral anymore and have turned it into an indefinite integral instead; so instead of resolving the variable name confusion you've created a new problem in that it doesn't make sense to equate a function to an indefinite integral (which is only defined up to an additive constant). What you need is e.g. $$ Y(\tau)=\int_0^\tau t\frac{\mathrm dF}{\mathrm dt}\mathrm dt\;. $$ –  joriki Jan 20 '13 at 22:24
    
@joriki Duly edited. How about now? –  ben Jan 21 '13 at 2:30
    
Yes, it looks OK now. –  joriki Jan 21 '13 at 8:44

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

No, this isn't right – too bad, you would have invented a generic method for solving all integrals :-) If

$$ \def\quest{\stackrel?=} \int_{X(0)}^{X(\tau)}Y(t)\,\mathrm dX\quest Y(\tau)(X(\tau)-1) $$

were correct, we could solve all integrals if we know a point $x_0$ where the integrand vanishes:

$$ \begin{align} \int_a^bf(x)\,\mathrm dx&=\int_{x_0}^bf(x)\,\mathrm dx-\int_{x_0}^af(x)\,\mathrm dx\\ &\quest f(b)(b-1)-f(a)(a-1)\;. \end{align} $$

The error is in the first step,

$$ \int_{X(0)}^{X(\tau)}Y(t)\,\mathrm dX\quest Y(\tau)X(\tau)-\int_{X(0)}^{X(\tau)}\frac{\mathrm dY}{\mathrm dX}\mathrm dX\;. $$

That's not a valid integration by parts. A valid integration by parts would look like this

$$ \int Y\mathrm dX=YX-\int X\mathrm dY $$

or like this if you prefer (with the same result):

$$ \int Y\mathrm dX=\int Y\frac{\mathrm dX}{\mathrm dt}\mathrm dt=YX-\int X\frac{\mathrm dY}{\mathrm dt}\mathrm dt=YX-\int X\mathrm dY\;. $$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.