Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm having some difficulty wrapping my head around rigid motions in a plane. In particular, I'm trying to solve this following problem:

In a Euclidean plane, show that the product of two rotations around different points is equal to either a rotation around a third point or a translation. Hint: Show that it has at most one fixed point.

I working in a plane $\Pi$ over an Euclidean ordered field, so rotations are transformations defined by $$ \begin{cases} x'=cx-sy \\ y'=sx+cy \end{cases} $$ where $c^2+s^2=1$. I simply take two rotations $\psi$ and $\phi$ such that $$ \phi=\begin{cases} x'=cx-dy\\ y'=dx+cy \end{cases} $$ and $$ \psi=\begin{cases} x'=ex-fy\\ y'=fx+ey \end{cases} $$ where $c^2+d^2=1$ and $e^2+f^2=1$. Composing them, I see $$ \begin{align*} \psi\phi(x,y) &= (ecx-edy-fdx-fcy,fcx-fdy+edx+ecy) \\ &= ((ec-fd)x-(ed+fc)y,(fc+ed)x+(ec-fd)y) \end{align*} $$ but $$ \begin{align*} (ec-fd)^2+(ed+fc)^2 &= e^2c^2-2ecfd+f^2d^2+e^2d^2+2edfc+f^2c^2 \\ &= (e^2+f^2)c^2+(e^2+f^2)d^2 \\ &= c^2+d^2=1 \end{align*} $$ so $\psi\phi$ is a rotation. I feel I have done something wrong, since the problem seems to be prodding me in a different direction. What is the correct way to show this? Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
You have so far only considered rotations around the origin. – Alexander Thumm Mar 21 '11 at 8:02
@Alexander, thanks, I'll try to redo my argument. – yunone Mar 21 '11 at 8:17
up vote 2 down vote accepted

With no coordinate system, or at least, as long as possible without one.

An affine transformation of $\mathbb{R}^n$ consists of a linear transformation followed by a translation $x \mapsto A x+ b$, which we denote by $(A,b)$. The transformation $(A,b)$ is a rotation if and only if $A$ is an element of the special orthogonal group $SO(n)$ and $A$ is not identity. It is a translation (or the identity) if $A$ is identity.

The composition of two rotations $(A,b)$ and $(A',b')$ is $x\mapsto (A'A)x+(A'b+b')$. One knows that $A'A$ is an element of $SO(n)$. Hence, if $A'A$ is not the identity, the composition is a rotation and if $A'A$ is the identity, this is a translation.

In dimension $2$, any element $A$ of the group $SO(2)$ can be written as $$ A=\begin{pmatrix} \cos(u) & \sin(u)\\ -\sin(u) & \cos(u)\end{pmatrix} $$ with $u$ real, hence $A$ is identity if and only if $u$ is a multiple of $2\pi$. The product $A'A$, which you need to compute the composition of $(A,b)$ and $(A',b')$, is $$ A'A=\begin{pmatrix} \cos(u+u') & \sin(u+u')\\ -\sin(u+u') & \cos(u+u')\end{pmatrix} $$ (this is the addition formula for sines and cosines). The result is a proper rotation when $u+u'$ is not a multiple of $2\pi$, and a translation when it is.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you Didier, the vocabulary of this post is a little unfamiliar to me, but I think I can apply your explanation to my more elementary case. I worked it out with a coordinate system, (despite your warning not to!), and I get a transformation of the form $x\mapsto (A'A)x+(A'b+b')$, and it make more sense now. Thank you. – yunone Mar 21 '11 at 8:58
@yunone Hence the links to wikipedia pages in my post. If the post was useful in the end, everything is fine. – Did Mar 21 '11 at 10:23

All isometries (rigid transformations) of a plane can be expressed as a composition of 3 or fewer reflections.

  • A composite of two reflections over intersecting lines is a rotation about the point of intersection of the lines of reflection.
  • A composite of two reflections over parallel lines is a translation perpendicular to the lines of reflection.
  • A composite of three reflections is a "glide reflection" (which can be expressed as a reflection followed by a translation).

Isometries that can be expressed as a composite of an even number of reflections preserve orientation; those that can be expressed as a composite of an odd number of reflections reverse orientation. Since rotations preserve orientation, composing rotations also preserves orientation, which means that the result must be a rotation or a translation (the result must be an isometry and cannot be an orientation-reversing isometry, so cannot be a reflection or glide-reflection).

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you for your answer Isaac, I was not as aware of how prevalent reflections are. The last paragraph of your post seems like it's hinting at the next exercise I want to try, so much thanks for that too! – yunone Mar 21 '11 at 9:00

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.