Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

As the titles says, I need to show that in a PID $R$ an ideal is maximal iff it is prime. This is easy to do if $R$ has a multiplicative identity. I can not do it if $R$ does not have an identity. It would be great if someone could help me out.

share|improve this question
3  
A PID is an integral domain, which has a multiplicative identity. –  Alan Simonin Jan 19 '13 at 14:34
2  
@AlanSimonin I checked my book's definition. It doesn't include this.I checked my book's definition. It doesn't include this. –  Amr Jan 19 '13 at 14:34
1  
Quote from Wikipedia : "It is usually assumed that commutative rings and integral domains have a multiplicative identity even though this is not always included in the definition of a ring" –  Alan Simonin Jan 19 '13 at 14:39
1  
It's an interesting question, even for commutative rings. Is it right to assume that you meant to ask "a non-zero ideal is maximal iff it is prime"? Since $(0)\subset\mathbb{Z}$ seems a prime ideal to me, while it most certainly isn't maximal. –  HSN Jan 19 '13 at 17:01
1  
@zaltan It's really unlikely Hungerford intended to ask about a domain without a unit. For instance, you can see that he assumes integral domains have a unit in the proof to theorem 3.4. If he did not intend for there to be units, he would have a really hard time defining irreducible elements and handling UFD's to begin with. Finally, most authors don't put unnecessarily complicated problems as problem #1 in a section. –  rschwieb Jan 20 '13 at 12:50
show 13 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.