Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose we have continuous local martingal $L$ given. We define $Z=\mathcal{E}(L)$, the stochastic exponential of $L$. I am interested in finding some condition such that $Z$ defines a density, i.e. I can define an equivalent measure $Q$ by setting $dQ:=Z_\infty dP$.

First of all: $Z$ is again a continuous local martingale, positive hence a supermartingale and $>0$ on $[0,\infty)$. Hence $Z_\infty$ exists. Now I need two assumption, such that everything works out nicely

  1. $E[Z_\infty]=1$, which is equivalent to the property that $Z$ is a $P$-martingale on $[0,\infty]$, hence uniformly integrable.
  2. I have to guarantee that $Z_\infty>0$ $P$-a.s.

For $2.$ we have $Z_\infty =e^{L_\infty -\frac{1}{2}\langle L\rangle_\infty}$. Therefore $L_\infty -\frac{1}{2}\langle L\rangle_\infty \not= -\infty$. Since the bracket process is increasing, we must have $\langle L\rangle_\infty <\infty$. The question is:

Can it happen that $\langle L\rangle_\infty <\infty$ but $L_\infty = -\infty$. If so, are there conditions which excludes $L_\infty=-\infty$ and $\langle L\rangle_\infty =\infty$?

share|improve this question
You're shooting questions with a constant speed :) this is by no means forbidden, but would you think of spending more time also on previous question of yours? – Ilya Jan 18 at 12:09

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Let $L$ be a continuous local martingale with initial value zero. Define

$$ F = \{\omega\in\Omega\mid L_t \textrm{ converges as }t\to\infty\}\\ G = \{\omega\in\Omega\mid \langle L\rangle_t \textrm{ converges as }t\to\infty\}. $$

It then holds that $F$ and $G$ are $P$-almost surely equal, in the sense that $P(F\setminus G)=P(G\setminus F)=0$. This implies that almost surely, it cannot happen that $\langle L\rangle_\infty<\infty$ but $L_\infty=-\infty.$

The proof of the above claim is not completely straightforward. You can find a detailed proof as the solution to Exercise 2.3 (in the appendix) in the following:

http://alexandersokol.dk/StochInt/ContinuousStochasticIntegration.pdf

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.