Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given $X\subseteq \Bbb R^m, f:X\to\Bbb R$ and $x\in X$, we say $f$ is lower semicontinous (l.s.c for short) at x if
$\forall \varepsilon>0\ \exists\ \delta >0\ \forall \in B(\delta,x), \ f(x)\le f(y)+\varepsilon$.
If x is a limit point of $X$, then f is lower semicontinuous iff $f(x)\le \lim_{\delta\to0^+}\ \inf\ f{\restriction}(X\cap B^*(\delta,y))$. And, it is also given that $A\subseteq\Bbb R^m\times\Bbb R$, put $\pi(A)=\{x\in \Bbb R^m:\exists p\in \Bbb R,(x,p)\in A\}$, the projection of $A$ on $\Bbb R^m$. For $x\in\Bbb R^m$, put $A_x=\{p\in \Bbb R:(x,p)\in A\}$, the fiber of $A$ over $x$.

Then, I need to show:
if $A\subseteq\Bbb R^m\times\Bbb R$ is compact and $g:\pi(A)\to\Bbb R$ is defined by $g(x)=\inf\ A_x$, then g is lower semicontinuous.

I got some idea about this problem, which is bu using the iff statement of limit inferior to show if g is not lsc, then it contradicts to the condition that $A$ is not compact. But I just do not know how to show this formally.

share|cite|improve this question

Assume that the iff statement is violated. Then you get $\varepsilon > 0$ and a sequence $x_n \to x$ with $g(x) > g(x_n) + \varepsilon$.. Now this should help you to get a contradiction with the definition of $g$ / the compacity of $A$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.