Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be Hausdorff. There is a Theorem:

If the closure of every discrete subspace of $X$ is $H$-closed, then $X$ is compact.

(A topological space $X$ is said to be $H$-closed, or Hausdorff closed, or absolutely closed if it is closed in every Hausdorff space space containing it as a subspace. This property is a generalization of compactness, since a compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed. Thus, every compact Hausdorff space is H-closed. The notion of an $H$-closed space has been introduced in 1924 by P. Alexandroff and P. Urysohn.)

In the process of prove, author said it is easy to see that $X$ is countably compact. However, I find it is difficult for me to get it. My question is this, just as the title explains:

How could I easily see that such space is countably compact?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Suppose that $X$ is not countably compact, and let $\{U_n:n\in\omega\}$ be an open cover of $X$ with no finite subcover. Without loss of generality we may assume that $U_n\subsetneqq U_{n+1}$ for each $n\in\omega$. For $n\in\omega$ fix $x_n\in U_{n+1}\setminus U_n$; since $X$ is $T_1$, $\{x_n:n\in\omega\}$ is easily seen to be a closed, discrete set in $X$. Now let

$$f:\{x_n:n\in\omega\}\to\Bbb R:x_n\mapsto 2^{-n}\;;$$

clearly $f$ embeds $\{x_n:n\in\omega\}$ as a non-closed subspace of $\Bbb R$, so $\{x_n:n\in\omega\}$ is a closed, discrete subset of $X$ that is not $H$-closed, contradicting the hypothesis on $X$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.