Tell me more ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

To First-order Logic, like in Hodges "A Shorter Model Theory", we can designate a $L$-term $t$ in a structure $\mathfrak{A}$ considering a sequence $\bar{a}$ of elements of the domain $A$ of $\mathfrak{A}$, by complexity on the terms:

  • if $t$ is a variable $x_i$, then $t^{\mathfrak{A}}[\bar{a}]$ is $a_i$;
  • if $t$ is a constant symbol $c$ of $L$, then $t^{\mathfrak{A}}[\bar{a}]$ is a element $c^{\mathfrak{A}}$ of $A$;
  • if $t$ is $ft_1...t_n$, where $f$ is a $n$-ary function symbol of $L$, then $t^{\mathfrak{A}}[\bar{a}]$ is $f^{\mathfrak{A}}t_1^{\mathfrak{A}}[\bar{a}]...t_n^{\mathfrak{A}}[\bar{a}]$ of $A$.

My question is: how can I extends this definition to evaluate Second-Order Terms too? That is, supose now that $L$ is a Second-Order Language; so, there is a function variable $F$ such that $Ft_1...t_n$ is a term $t$.

Then I suppose that $\bar{a}$ is a ''twested'' sequence of elements of $A$, a sequence of relations and function on $\mathfrak{A}$ and $t^{\mathfrak{A}}[\bar{a}]$ is $F^{\mathfrak{A}}[\bar{a}]t_1^{\mathfrak{A}}[\bar{a}]...t^{\mathfrak{A}}[\bar{a}]_n$, where $F^{\mathfrak{A}}[\bar{a}]$ is some $n$-function on $\mathfrak{A}$ or the ideas involved need be more ``sofisticated''?

share|improve this question

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.