Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

My book states, that if we apply the "mean value theorem in integral form" on $f'$, then follows: $\int_a^b{f'} = (b-a)f'(c)$. If we compare this with the "canonical mean value theorem": $f(b) - f(a) = (b-a)f'(c)$, then this suggests that $\int_a^b{f'} = f(b) - f(a)$. It also states that although the former suggests the latter, it doesn't prove the latter.

My question is why isn't this a proof?

share|cite|improve this question
I think it's a circular argument, since this theorem depends FFTC – dwarandae Jan 16 '13 at 23:20
@dwarandae what is fftc? – xcrypt Jan 16 '13 at 23:23
The $c$s are only the same if you know the latter equality holds. If you just know both LHS are equal to the same RHS at some $c$, those could be different $c$s. – gnometorule Jan 16 '13 at 23:23
@xcrypt First Fundamentel Theorem of Calculus, sorry. – dwarandae Jan 16 '13 at 23:24
You can establish the mean value theorem using Rolle's and Heine-Borel theorems. After that, you can prove the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus using the mean value theorem and Darboux sums. This is what Rudin's Principles does. – Ayman Hourieh Jan 16 '13 at 23:37

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.