Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In his discussion of the radial wave function of hydrogen Griffiths (Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed, p.146) gives the general solution of$$\frac{d^{2}u}{d\rho^{2}}=\frac{l\left(l+1\right)}{\rho^{2}}u$$ as$$u\left(\rho\right)=C\rho^{l+1}+D\rho^{-l}.$$ Why is this? There's not even a $u$ on the right-hand side! http://physicspages.com/2011/06/06/hydrogen-atom-radial-equation/ says this general solution can be verified by direct substitution, ie $$\frac{d^{2}u}{d\rho^{2}}=Cl\left(l+1\right)\rho^{l-1}+D\left(-l\right)\left(-l-1\right)\rho^{-l-2}=\frac{l\left(l+1\right)}{\rho^{2}}u.$$

I've fiddled around with this all afternoon (again there's no $u$ in the second expression, which I find ultra-confusing) but can't see how these expressions are equal.

share|improve this question

migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Jan 16 '13 at 18:06

This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.

    
Personally, I'm... not sure I understand your point :-/ What's exactly the matter? I see that this ODE in the radial part of the wavefunction is clearly satisfied by direct substitution. Maybe you lost a little bit lost in the algebra? ó_ò –  user17581 Jan 16 '13 at 17:36
    
Obviously, what's obvious to you is not obvious to me. –  Peter4075 Jan 16 '13 at 19:09
add comment

5 Answers 5

up vote 1 down vote accepted

You just need to use substitution:

$$\frac{l(l+1)}{\rho^2}(C\rho^{l+1}+D\rho^{-l})$$

from the third term which is equal to the second expression. The second set of terms (in parenthesis) is the u-term that you are looking for. Is this what you wanted?

share|improve this answer
    
Yes, I just couldn't see it. Now it seems embarrassingly obvious. –  Peter4075 Jan 16 '13 at 19:59
add comment

It's really very simple! In your first equation, $u = u(\rho)$ is some function of $\rho$ you want to determine. So of course a solution will not 'depend on $u$' but on $\rho$.

For the second part of your question, let's consider only the first term, i.e. $u(\rho) = C \rho^{l+1}.$ If you plug that into the left-hand side of the differential equation, you find $$\frac{d^2 u(\rho)}{d \rho^2} = \frac{d}{d \rho} \frac{d u(\rho)}{d \rho} = \frac{d}{d \rho} \left[C (l+1) \rho^l\right] = C (l+1) l \rho^{l-1}.$$ But this is almost $u(\rho)$ itself, only multiplied by $l(l+1)$ and divided by $\rho^2.$ So we could continue $$ \ldots = \frac{l(l+1)}{\rho^2} u(\rho).$$ This proves that for any $C$, $u(\rho) = C \rho^{l+1}$ solves your differential equation. You can do the same for the second term and you can also check that the sum of both terms works.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks. I couldn't see the wood for the trees. –  Peter4075 Jan 16 '13 at 20:00
add comment

Go on to simplify this expression (-l)(-l-1)=l(l+1). Factor this out, factor out to powers of rho and you're done.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Another way to look at it is: suppose $u(\rho)$ is $e^{something}$. The differential equation tells us that the second derivative is $\frac{cu}{\rho^2}$ with $c=l(l+1)$. You can see that "something" should be a logarithm, because it's derivative is $1/\rho$, so suppose something equals $a\cdot \ln \rho$ . Just try to differentiate: $\frac{du}{d\rho}=\frac{a\cdot \exp(a\ln \rho)}{\rho}$. Differentiate this again: $\frac{d^2u}{d\rho^2}=-\frac{a\cdot \exp(a\ln \rho)}{\rho^2}+\frac{a^2\cdot \exp(a\ln \rho)}{\rho^2}= \exp(a\ln \rho)\left(\frac{a(a-1)}{\rho^2}\right)$. But $a(a-1)$ must equal $l(l+1)$. So $-l=a$. Also $l+1=a$ is a solution. So $u=A\exp(-l\ln\rho)+B \exp((l+1)\ln\rho)$. This is equal to: $u=A\rho^{-l}+B\rho^{l+1}$ because $e^{\ln x}=x$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

This differential equation can be transformed into an ordinary differential equation with constant coefficients by means of the substitution $x = \mathrm{ln} \rho$. The reason for this is that the equation is homogeneous in $\rho$, i.e., invariant under the transformation $\rho \rightarrow \lambda \rho$ ($\lambda = \mathrm{const.}$).

share|improve this answer
    
Afraid I don't understand that. But I got there eventually. –  Peter4075 Jan 16 '13 at 20:02
    
By the way, although someone has tagged this as Homework, it isn't for me. In my sixtieth decade, I'm simply trying to struggle through Griffiths' book. –  Peter4075 Jan 16 '13 at 20:24
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.