Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $(R,\mathfrak{m})$ be a noetherian local ring, and $E=E_R(R/\mathfrak{m})$ the injective hull of $R/\mathfrak{m}$. What do we know about the Krull dimension of $E$? Thank you.

share|cite|improve this question
@ Tobias. Thank you! – tlquyen Jan 17 '13 at 6:45

We have $\operatorname{Ann}_RE(R/\mathfrak m)=(0)$.

Let $a\in R$ such that $aE=0$. If $\operatorname{Ann}(a)=R$, we are done. Otherwise, $\operatorname{Ann}(a)\subseteq\mathfrak m$. Set $x=\hat 1\in E.$ Obviously $r\in \operatorname{Ann}(a)\Rightarrow r\in\mathfrak m\Rightarrow rx=0\Rightarrow r\in\operatorname{Ann}(x)$, so $\operatorname{Ann}(a)\subseteq\operatorname{Ann}(x)$. Now define $f:Ra\to E$ by $f(ra)=rx$. Since $E$ is injective $f$ can be extended to $R$ and thus we get an element $y\in E$ such that $x=ay$. It follows that $x=0$, a contradiction.

Since $\operatorname{Ann}_RE_R(R/\mathfrak{m})=(0)$ we get $\dim E_R(R/\mathfrak{m})=\dim R$. (Here the Krull dimension of an $R$-module $M$ is considered as being $\dim R/\operatorname{Ann}(M)$.)

share|cite|improve this answer
Could you explain why $rx=0$ and how $f$ is extended to $R$. THanks. – user58764 Jan 18 '13 at 15:13
$rx=0$ since $x=1+\mathfrak m$ and $r\in\mathfrak m$. $f$ extends to $R$ because $Ra\subseteq R$ and $E$ is injective. – user26857 Jan 18 '13 at 18:24
Where did you use the Noetherianess of $R$? – user58764 Jan 19 '13 at 5:31
@user58764 As you can see, I didn't use it. – user26857 Jan 19 '13 at 9:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.