Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the "standard" way to denote all positive (or non-negative) real numbers? I'd think

$$ \mathbb R^+ $$

but I believe that that is usually used to denote "all real numbers including infinity".

So is there a standard way to denote the set

$$ \{x \in \mathbb R : x \geq 0\} \; ?$$

share|improve this question
1  
That $\mathbb{N}$ should be $\mathbb{R}$ of course. I've seen $\mathbb{R}_+$ and $\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$, but "standard" is debatable. –  wildildildlife Mar 19 '11 at 15:06
5  
Note that $0$ is not positive. –  Yuval Filmus Mar 19 '11 at 15:08
9  
Also, I wouldn't agree that $R_+$ usually includes $\infty$. The extended real line is used only in certain areas. –  Yuval Filmus Mar 19 '11 at 15:09
2  
I removed the set theory tag since this isn't a set theory question. –  Apostolos Mar 19 '11 at 15:09
4  
$[0,\infty)$ or if you want to work with the extended real line, $[0, +\infty]$. –  cardinal Mar 19 '11 at 15:12
show 1 more comment

5 Answers 5

up vote 10 down vote accepted

Not that I knew of. There are many, e.g.

  • $\mathbb{R^+_0}$,
  • $\mathbb{R^+}$ and
  • $[0, \infty)$.
share|improve this answer
add comment

I'd completely avoid using $\mathbb{R}^+$ since people won't know if $0$ is included or not. So $\mathbb{R}_0^+$ would be a possibility, but then how would you denote $\{x\in\mathbb{R}:x>0\}$? Again, with $\mathbb{R}^+$ people won't know that $0$ isn't included. Personally, I prefer writing $[0,\infty)$ and $(0,\infty)$ when it's clear from the context that an interval in $\mathbb{R}$ is meant.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Some of my profs use $\mathbb{R^{\ge 0}}$. I like to add whatever to the top so $\mathbb{R^{\le a}}$ just means all reals less than $a$.

share|improve this answer
2  
This definitely strikes me as nonstandard, at least in the U.S. I'd be curious to know where all this is used. (Not saying it's a bad notation, just never seen it in any texts of common mathematics publishers, for example.) –  cardinal Mar 19 '11 at 18:55
    
I learned this from my math prof who grew up in Canada. But yeah I've never seen it outside her notes, but it does make writing $\{ x \in R \mid x < a\}$ easier! –  hwong557 Mar 19 '11 at 19:00
    
@hwong557, interesting. I'd think $(-\infty, a)$ would be almost as compact. –  cardinal Mar 19 '11 at 19:04
    
Interval notation does not per se fix the basic set. –  Raphael Mar 19 '11 at 21:11
1  
@cardinal: I think I can confirm that to a certain extent. I'm pretty sure we exclusively used interval notation à la Bourbaki in elementary and high school in Switzerland (I had at least 6 math teachers at various places) and it is exclusively used in at least four elementary texts on (what we call) algebra in my bookshelf. –  t.b. Mar 21 '11 at 13:30
show 3 more comments

The following is also pretty common notation for the non-negative reals: $\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$ or $\mathbb{R}_{+}$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

$\mathbb{R}^+$ includes $0$ in Probability Tutorials. $\mathbb{R}^+_0$ is more clear though, so I've used it in the exercises.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.